Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Four Classes of Brain Nicotinic Receptors Using β2 Mutant Mice

Zoli, Michele, Léna, Clément, Picciotto, Marina R., Changeux, Jean-Pierre·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although the expression patterns of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits thus far described are known, the subunit composition of functional receptors in different brain areas is an ongoing question. Mice lacking the β2 subunit of the nAChR were used for receptor autoradiography studies and patch-clamp recording in thin brain slices. Four distinct types of nAChRs were identified, expanding on an existing classification [Alkondon M, Albuquerque EX (1993) Diversity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat hippocampal neurons. I. Pharmacological and functional evidence for distinct structural subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 265:1455–1473.], and tentatively identifying the subunit composition of nAChRs in different brain regions. Type 1 nAChRs bind α-bungarotoxin, are not altered in β2 −/− mice, and contain the α7 subunit. Type 2 nAChRs contain the β2 subunit because they are absent in β2 −/− mice, bind all nicotinic agonists used with high affinity (excluding α-bungarotoxin), have an order of potency for nicotine ≫ cytisine in electrophysiological experiments, and are likely to be composed of α4β2 in most brain regions, with other α subunits contributing in specific areas. Type 3 nAChRs bind epibatidine with high affinity in equilibrium binding experiments and show that cytisine is as effective as nicotine in electrophysiological experiments; their distribution and persistence in β2 −/− mice strongly suggest a subunit composition of α3β4. Type 4 nAChRs bind cytisine and epibatidine with high affinity in equilibrium binding experiments and persist in β2 −/− mice; cytisine = nicotine in electrophysiological experiments. Type 4 nAChRs also exhibit faster desensitization than type 3 nAChRs at high doses of nicotine. Knock-out animals lacking individual α subunits should allow a further dissection of nAChR subclasses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-12-04461.1998

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Zoli, M., Léna, C., Picciotto, M. R., & Changeux, J.-P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-06-15
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
4461-4472
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W4317639052
Cited by
343
References
3
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Four Classes of Brain Nicotinic Receptors Using β2 Mutant Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-12-04461.1998
The paper
Zoli, M., Léna, C., Picciotto, M. R., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998). Identification of Four Classes of Brain Nicotinic Receptors Using β2 Mutant Mice. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-12-04461.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.