Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI

Open access
Coull, Jennifer T., Nobre, Anna C.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although attention is distributed across time as well as space, the temporal allocation of attention has been less well researched than its spatial counterpart. A temporal analog of the covert spatial orientation task [Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160–174] was developed to compare the neural systems involved in directing attention to spatial locations versus time intervals. We asked whether there exists a general system for allocating attentional resources, independent of stimulus dimension, or whether functionally specialized brain regions are recruited for directing attention toward spatial versus temporal aspects of the environment. We measured brain activity in seven healthy volunteers by using positron emission tomography (PET) and in eight healthy volunteers by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The task manipulated cued attention to spatial locations (S) and temporal intervals (T) in a factorial design. Symbolic central cues oriented subjects toward S only (left or right), toward T only (300 msec or 1500 msec), toward both S and T simultaneously, or provided no information regarding S or T. Subjects also were scanned during a resting baseline condition. Behavioral data showed benefits and costs for performance during temporal attention similar to those established for spatial attention. Brain-imaging data revealed a partial overlap between neural systems involved in the performance of spatial versus temporal orientation of attention tasks. Additionally, hemispheric asymmetries revealed preferential right and left parietal activation for spatial and temporal attention, respectively. Parietal cortex was activated bilaterally by attending to both dimensions simultaneously. This is the first direct comparison of the neural correlates of attending to spatial versus temporal cues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07426.1998

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-01202.1993 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Coull JT, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD (1998) Monitoring for target objects: activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task. Neuropsychologia, in press. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Deiber, 1996, Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study., J Neurophysiol, 75, 233, 10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.233 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.357 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.88 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.122 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/hbm.460030303 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/0278-2626(82)90009-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-03-01085.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01058-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/385154a0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.2.136 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Jueptner, 1995, Localization of a cerebellar timing process using PET., Neurology, 45, 1540, 10.1212/WNL.45.8.1540 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kingstone A (1992) Combining expectancies. Q J Exp Psychol 44[A]:69–104. · DOI
  15. Kinsbourne M (1987) Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. in Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial attention, ed Jeannerod M (Elsevier, Amsterdam). · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s002210050412 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38139.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00001-2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/brain/120.3.515 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nobre, 1998, The overlap of brain regions that control saccades and covert visual spatial attention revealed by fMRI., Neuroimage, 7, 59, 10.1016/S1053-8119(18)30842-5 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00134-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/brain/120.2.229 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1006/nimg.1997.0269 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Rafal R Robertson L (1995) The neurology of visual attention. in The cognitive neurosciences, ed Gazzaniga MS (MIT, Cambridge, MA), pp 625–648.
  27. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05528.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00050-X · DOI · Paper page
  30. Talairach J Tournoux (1988) A co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. (Thieme, Stuttgart).
  31. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb22957.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wojciulik, 1998, A general visual attention mechanism in the human brain: evidence from fMRI., Neuroimage, 7, 578, 10.1016/S1053-8119(18)30911-X · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,269

Metadata

Authors
Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-09-15
Volume
18
Issue
18
Pages
7426-7435
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1481105901
Cited by
1,269
References
10
FWCI
18.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07426.1998
The paper
Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07426.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.