The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Networks Underlying Mechanisms of Time Perception
Open accessAbstract
Precise timing of sensory information from multiple sensory streams is essential for many aspects of human perception and action. Animal and human research implicates the basal ganglia and cerebellar systems in timekeeping operations, but investigations into the role of the cerebral cortex have been limited. Individuals with focal left (LHD) or right hemisphere (RHD) lesions and control subjects performed two time perception tasks (duration perception, wherein the standard tone pair interval was 300 or 600 msec) and a frequency perception task, which controlled for deficits in time-independent processes shared by both tasks. When frequency perception deficits were controlled, only patients with RHD showed time perception deficits. Time perception competency was correlated with an independent test of switching nonspatial attention in the RHD but not the LHD patients, despite attention deficits in both groups. Lesion overlays of patients with RHD and impaired timing showed that 100% of the patients with anterior damage had lesions in premotor and prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 6, 8, 9, and 46), and 100% with posterior damage had lesions in the inferior parietal cortex. All LHD patients with normal timing had damage in these same regions, whereas few, if any, RHD patients with normal timing had similar lesion distributions. These results implicate a right hemisphere prefrontal–inferior parietal network in timing. Time-dependent attention and working memory functions may contribute to temporal perception deficits observed after damage to this network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 · Cited by 8,527
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230 · cited 2×
“However, different frontal areas have been associated with working memory (Pardo et al., 1991; Paulesu et al., 1993), and cytoarchitectonic maps of some areas (9 and 46) vary considerably (Rajkowska and Goldman-Rakic, 1995a).”
BackgroundEffects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention
Posner, M., Walker, J., Friedrich, F., & Rafal, R. (1984) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.04-07-01863.1984 · Cited by 2,191
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
GIBBON, J., CHURCH, R. M., & MECK, W. H. (1984) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x · Cited by 1,798
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G., & Petersen, S. (1991) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-08-02383.1991 · Cited by 1,588
A PET study of visuospatial attention
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F., Shulman, G., & Petersen, S. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-03-01202.1993 · Cited by 1,520
Heilman, K. M., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R. T. (2000) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-2000-13179 · Cited by 1,438
Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function
Middleton, F. A., & Strick, P. L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7939688 · Cited by 1,356
Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography
Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349061a0 · Cited by 1,284
Cited by
The neural basis of temporal processing
Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247 · Cited by 976
Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012166 · Cited by 966
Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks
Bassett, D. S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T., & Bullmore, E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606005103 · Cited by 814
The image of time: A voxel-wise meta-analysis
Wiener, M., Turkeltaub, P., & Coslett, H. B. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.064 · Cited by 594
Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque
Leon, M. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00185-5 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrington, D. L., Haaland, K. Y., & Knight, R. T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1085-1095
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2168620049
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical Networks Underlying Mechanisms of Time Perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-03-01085.1998
- The paper
- Harrington, D. L., Haaland, K. Y., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Cortical Networks Underlying Mechanisms of Time Perception. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-03-01085.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.