The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-Term Memory for Reaching to Visual Targets: Psychophysical Evidence for Body-Centered Reference Frames
Open accessAbstract
Pointing to a remembered visual target involves the transformation of visual information into an appropriate motor output, with a passage through short-term memory storage. In an attempt to identify the reference frames used to represent the target position during the memory period, we measured errors in pointing to remembered three-dimensional (3D) targets. Subjects pointed after a fixed delay to remembered targets distributed within a 22 mm radius volume. Conditions varied in terms of lighting (dim light or total darkness), delay duration (0.5, 5.0, and 8.0 sec), effector hand (left or right), and workspace location. Pointing errors were quantified by 3D constant and variable errors and by a novel measure of local distortion in the mapping from target to endpoint positions. The orientation of variable errors differed significantly between light and dark conditions. Increasing the memory delay in darkness evoked a reorientation of variable errors, whereas in the light, the viewer-centered variability changed only in magnitude. Local distortion measurements revealed an anisotropic contraction of endpoint positions toward an “average” response along an axis that points between the eyes and the effector arm. This local contraction was present in both lighting conditions. The magnitude of the contraction remained constant for the two memory delays in the light but increased significantly for the longer delays in darkness. These data argue for the separate storage of distance and direction information within short-term memory, in a reference frame tied to the eyes and the effector arm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Representing spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey
Lacquaniti, F., Guigon, E., Bianchi, L., Ferraina, S., & Caminiti, R. (1995) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/5.5.391 · Cited by 398 · cited 2×
“Many neurons in dorsal area 5 are best tuned to either the azimuth, elevation, or distance of the endpoint relative to the body (Lacquaniti et al., 1995).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Intentional Maps in Posterior Parietal Cortex
Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142922 · Cited by 1,294
Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching
Buneo, C. A., Jarvis, M. R., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416632a · Cited by 656
Graziano, M. S. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10418 · Cited by 500
The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability
van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00652.2003 · Cited by 494
Ivanenko, Y. P., Grasso, R., Macellari, V., & Lacquaniti, F. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.3070 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntyre, J., Stratta, F., & Lacquaniti, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-10-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8423-8435
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2148223111
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-Term Memory for Reaching to Visual Targets: Psychophysical Evidence for Body-Centered Reference Frames. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08423.1998
- The paper
- McIntyre, J., Stratta, F., & Lacquaniti, F. (1998). Short-Term Memory for Reaching to Visual Targets: Psychophysical Evidence for Body-Centered Reference Frames. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08423.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.