The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partial Inactivation of the Primary Motor Cortex Hand Area: Effects on Individuated Finger Movements
Open accessAbstract
After large lesions of the primary motor cortex (M1), voluntary movements of affected body parts are weak and slow. In addition, the relative independence of moving one body part without others is lost; attempts at individuated movements of a given body part are accompanied by excessive, unintended motion of contiguous body parts. The effects of partial inactivation of the M1 hand area are comparatively unknown, however. If the M1 hand area contains the somatotopically ordered finger representations implied by the classic homunculus or simiusculus, then partial inactivation might produce weakness, slowness, and loss of independence of one or two adjacent digits without affecting other digits. But if control of each finger movement is distributed in the M1 hand area as many studies suggest, then partial inactivation might produce dissociation of weakness, slowness, and relative independence of movement, and which fingers movements are impaired might be unrelated to the location of the inactivation along the central sulcus. To investigate the motoric deficits resulting from partial inactivation of the M1 hand area, we therefore made single intracortical injections of muscimol as trained monkeys performed visually cued, individuated flexion–extension movements of the fingers and wrist. We found little if any evidence that which finger movements were impaired after each injection was related to the injection location along the central sulcus. Unimpaired fingers could be flanked on both sides by impaired fingers, and the flexion movements of a given finger could be unaffected even though the extension movements were impaired, or vice versa. Partial inactivation also could produce dissociated weakness and slowness versus loss of independence in a given finger movement. These findings suggest that control of each individuated finger movement is distributed widely in the M1 hand area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Cited by
Plasticity and Primary Motor Cortex
Sanes, J. N., & Donoghue, J. P. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393 · Cited by 1,202
Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex
Nudo, R. J., Plautz, E. J., & Frost, S. B. (2001) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.1104 · Cited by 561
Häger-Ross, C., & Schieber, M. H. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-22-08542.2000 · Cited by 444
Self-citationDissociating the Role of Ventral and Dorsal Premotor Cortex in Precision Grasping
Davare, M., Andres, M., Cosnard, G., Thonnard, J.-L., & Olivier, E. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3386-05.2006 · Cited by 346
Recovery recapitulates ontogeny
Cramer, S. C., & Chopp, M. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01562-9 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Schieber, M. H., & Poliakov, A. V.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 9038-9054
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1801191033
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partial Inactivation of the Primary Motor Cortex Hand Area: Effects on Individuated Finger Movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-09038.1998
- The paper
- Schieber, M. H., & Poliakov, A. V. (1998). Partial Inactivation of the Primary Motor Cortex Hand Area: Effects on Individuated Finger Movements. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-09038.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.