The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET
Open accessAbstract
Positron emission tomography was used to identify neural systems involved in the acquisition and expression of sequential movements produced by different effectors. Subjects were tested on the serial reaction time task under implicit learning conditions. In the initial acquisition phase, subjects responded to the stimuli with keypresses using the four fingers of the right hand. During this phase, the stimuli followed a fixed sequence for one group of subjects (group A) and were randomly selected for another group (group B). In the transfer phase, arm movements were used to press keys on a substantially larger keyboard, and for both groups, the stimuli followed the sequence. Behavioral indices provided clear evidence of learning during the acquisition phase for group A and transfer when switched to the large keyboard. Sequence acquisition was associated with learning-related increases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in a network of areas in the contralateral left hemisphere, including sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and rostral inferior parietal cortex. After transfer, activity in inferior parietal cortex remained high, suggesting that this area had encoded the sequence at an abstract level independent of the particular effectors used to perform the task. In contrast, activity in sensorimotor cortex shifted to a more dorsal locus, consistent with motor cortex somatotopy. Thus, activity here was effector-specific. An increase in rCBF was also observed in the cingulate motor area at transfer, suggesting a role linking the abstract sequential representations with the task-relevant effector system. These results highlight a network of areas involved in sequence encoding and retrieval.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
PENFIELD, W., & BOLDREY, E. (1937) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/60.4.389 · Cited by 4,188
Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour
Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J., & Vogt, B. A. (1995) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/118.1.279 · Cited by 3,377
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747 · Cited by 3,273
Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8 · Cited by 2,963
Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent
Friston, K. J., Worsley, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Mazziotta, J. C., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010306 · Cited by 1,907
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Automated Image Registration: I. General Methods and Intrasubject, Intramodality Validation
Woods, R. P., Grafton, S. T., Holmes, C. J., Cherry, S. R., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1998) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199801000-00027 · Cited by 1,707
Self-citationNudo, R., Milliken, G., Jenkins, W., & Merzenich, M. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-02-00785.1996 · Cited by 1,413
Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography
Jenkins, I., Brooks, D., Nixon, P., Frackowiak, R., & Passingham, R. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-06-03775.1994 · Cited by 1,150
Cited by
Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies
Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290051137585 · Cited by 3,598
The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
Grush, R. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000093 · Cited by 1,387
Plasticity and Primary Motor Cortex
Sanes, J. N., & Donoghue, J. P. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393 · Cited by 1,202
Nitsche, M. A., Schauenburg, A., Lang, N., Liebetanz, D., Exner, C., Paulus, W., & Tergau, F. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321662994 · Cited by 1,032
Central mechanisms of motor skill learning
Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., Sakai, K., & Nakahara, H. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00307-0 · Cited by 1,023
Metadata
- Authors
- Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-11-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 9420-9428
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2147898864
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 67
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-22-09420.1998
- The paper
- Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (1998). Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-22-09420.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.