The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone
Open accessAbstract
After 24 hr of maternal deprivation, significant elevations in ACTH and the naturally occurring glucocorticoid corticosterone (CORT) are observed during the stress-hyporesponsive period. The deprived pups also showed in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) a marked increase of stress-induced c-fos mRNA and a reduction of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA; in hippocampal CA1, a reduction of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and GR was observed. Here, we examined whether these changes are reversed by (1) preventing the elevations of CORT characteristic for the 11-d-old deprived pups by administering the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX); or (2) reinstating some aspects of maternal behavior. The pups were either (1) left undisturbed, (2) stroked, or (3) stroked and episodically fed by cheek cannulation. At postnatal day 12, peripheral and neural stress markers were measured. Nondeprived animals served as controls. Experiment 1 demonstrates that although CORT was kept low by DEX, the central effects on CORT receptors, CRH, and c-fos mRNA were still present, except for MR in hippocampal CA1. Experiment 2 shows that stroking alone prevented the stress-induced rise in ACTH and c-fos mRNA and in the reduction in CRH and MR mRNA. In pups that were fed and stroked, CORT and GR mRNA resembled nondeprived controls. In conclusion, the changes in peripheral endocrine responses and in the brain cannot be attributed to the effect of elevated CORT concentrations, which are characteristic of the maternally deprived neonate. However, reinstating some components of the dams’ nurturing behavior can reverse the effects evoked by maternal deprivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Suchecki, D., Rosenfeld, P., & Levine, S. (1993) · Developmental Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0165-3806(93)90022-3 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Maternal care, hippocampal synaptogenesis and cognitive development in rats
Liu, D., Diorio, J., Day, J. C., Francis, D. D., & Meaney, M. J. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77702 · Cited by 1,195
Hostinar, C. E., Sullivan, R. M., & Gunnar, M. R. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0032671 · Cited by 739
Prenatal stress, glucocorticoids and the programming of the brain
Welberg, L. A. M., & Seckl, J. R. (2001) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2001.00601.x · Cited by 928
Daskalakis, N. P., Bagot, R. C., Parker, K. J., Vinkers, C. H., & de Kloet, E. R. (2013) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.008 · Cited by 579
Toward understanding how early-life stress reprograms cognitive and emotional brain networks
Chen, Y., & Baram, T. Z. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.181 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- van Oers, H. J. J., de Kloet, E. R., Whelan, T., & Levine, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 10171-10179
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1938688077
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-23-10171.1998
- The paper
- van Oers, H. J. J., de Kloet, E. R., Whelan, T., & Levine, S. (1998). Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-23-10171.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.