The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Areas Involved in Encoding and Applying Directional Expectations to Moving Objects
Open accessAbstract
Two experiments used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the cortical areas involved in establishing an expectation about the direction of motion of an upcoming object and applying that expectation to the analysis of the object. In Experiment 1, subjects saw a stationary cue that either indicated the direction of motion of a subsequent test stimulus (directional cue) or provided no directional information (neutral cue). Their task was to detect the presence of coherent motion in the test stimulus. The stationary directional cue produced larger modulations than the neutral cue, with respect to a passive viewing baseline, both in motion-sensitive areas such as left MT+ and the anterior intraparietal sulcus, as well as motion-insensitive areas such as the posterior intraparietal sulcus and the junction of the left medial precentral sulcus and superior frontal sulcus. Experiment 2 used an event-related fMRI technique to separate signals during the cue period, in which the expectation was encoded and maintained, from signals during the subsequent test period, in which the expectation was applied to the test object. Cue period activations from a stationary, directional cue included many of the same motion-sensitive and -insensitive areas from Experiment 1 that produced directionally specific modulations. Prefrontal activations were not observed during the cue period, even though the stationary cue information had to be translated into a format appropriate for influencing motion detection, and this format was maintained for the duration of the cue period (∼5 sec).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, cue-related activity in MTϩ tends to be more transient than that in the IPS or FEF (4,8,46).”
From Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems (2006) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R., & Tank, D. W. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868 · Cited by 6,483
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Funahashi, S., Bruce, C. J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1989.61.2.331 · Cited by 2,685
Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1
Boynton, G., Engel, S., Glover, G., & Heeger, D. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04207.1996 · Cited by 2,522
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task
Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386604a0 · Cited by 1,876
A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex
Zeki, S., Watson, J. D. G., Lueck, C. J., Friston, K. J., Christopher Kennard, C., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-03-00641.1991 · Cited by 1,717
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80734-5 · Cited by 1,622
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Conturo, 1996, Sensitivity optimization and experimental design in functional magnetic resonance imaging., Soc Neurosci Abstr, 22, 7
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<280::AID-HBM13>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–298 of 298
Shi, Y., Meindl, T., Szameitat, A. J., Müller, H. J., & Schubert, T. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.001 · Cited by 17
Directional asymmetries in cognition: What is left to write about?
Chatterjee, A. K. (2011) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110254310.189 · Cited by 15
Sekuler, R., Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & Blake, R. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426.pas0104 · Cited by 16
The neural substrate of orientation short‐term memory and resistance to distractor items
Cornette, L., Dupont, P. J., & Orban, G. A. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01830.x · Cited by 14
Paradis, A., Jacques Droulez, A., Cornilleau-Pérès, V., & Poline, J.-B. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.027 · Cited by 14
Two neural systems for visual orienting and the pathophysiology of unilateral spatial neglect
Corbetta, M., Kincade, M. J., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508335.003.0019 · Cited by 14
Self-citationColor Improves Speed of Processing But Not Perception in a Motion Illusion
Perry, C. J., & Fallah, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00092 · Cited by 15
Task relevance modulates the cortical representation of feature conjunctions in the target template
Reeder, R., Hanke, M., & Pollmann, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04123-8 · Cited by 13
Talalay, I. V., Kurgansky, А. V., & Machinskaya, R. I. (2018) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13269 · Cited by 14
Bolton, T. A. W., Jochaut, D., Giraud, A., & Ville, D. V. D. (2019) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/59083 · Cited by 13
Ojemann, J. G., McKinstry, R. C., Mukherjee, P., Park, T. S., & Burton, H. (2004) · Child s Nervous System · doi:10.1007/s00381-004-1051-y · Cited by 13
Attentional set for external information activates the right intraparietal area
Imaruoka, T., Yanagida, T., & Miyauchi, S. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00274-4 · Cited by 12
Human feature-based attention consists of two distinct spatiotemporal processes.
Gledhill, D., Grimsen, C., Fahle, M., & Wegener, D. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.8.8 · Cited by 12
Han, Z., Liu, T., Shi, Z., Zhang, J., Suo, D., Wang, L., Chen, D., Wu, J., & Yan, T. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad276 · Cited by 14
Imaging image processing in the human brain
Orban, G. A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/00019052-200102000-00008 · Cited by 11
Cannon, R. L., Kerson, C. R., Hampshire, A., & Garner, C. L. (2012) · Journal of Neurotherapy · doi:10.1080/10874208.2012.730408 · Cited by 11
Representational momentum in older adults
Piotrowski, A. S., & Jakobson, L. S. (2011) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.05.002 · Cited by 10
Cortical Response to Task-relevant Stimuli Presented outside the Primary Focus of Attention
Houtkamp, R., & Braun, J. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21327 · Cited by 10
Motion Processing in Human Visual Cortex
Blake, R., Grossman, E., & Sekuler, R. (2003) · Frontiers in neuroscience · doi:10.1201/9780203507599.ch13 · Cited by 10
Organization of Human Visual Cortex
Rajimehr, R., & Tootell, R. B. H. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370880-9.00292-9 · Cited by 11
Visual search and single-cell electrophysiology of attention: Area MT, from sensation to perception
Treue, S., & Martínez-Trujillo, J. (2006) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280500197256 · Cited by 10
Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in visual object-based selective attention
Sinnett, S., Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. F. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1687-z · Cited by 9
Effects of scanner acoustic noise on intrinsic brain activity during auditory stimulation
Yakunina, N., Kang, E. K., Kim, T. S., Min, J.-H., Kim, S. S., & Nam, E. (2015) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1561-1 · Cited by 11
Leinsinger, G., Born, C., Meindl, T., Bokde, A. L. W., Britsch, S., Lopez‐Bayo, P., Teipel, S. J., Möller, H.-J., Hampel, H. J., & Reiser, M. F. (2007) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000107098 · Cited by 9
Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., Naaz, F., Shaffer, R. A., & McDermott, K. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx264 · Cited by 7
Functional brain organization of preparatory attentional control in visual search
Bourke, P. A., Brown, S., Ngan, E. T. C., & Mario Liotti, A. (2013) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.032 · Cited by 8
Contrasting effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on size perception
Han, Y., Tan, Z.-H., Zhuang, H., & Qian, J. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12529 · Cited by 7
Self-Generated or Cue-Induced—Different Kinds of Expectations to Be Considered
Kemper, M., & Gaschler, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00053 · Cited by 7
Increase in internetwork functional connectivity in the human brain with attention capture
Sun, H., Yue, Q., Sy, J. L., Godwin, D., Eaton, H. P., Raghavan, P., & Marois, R. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00693.2019 · Cited by 6
Lanssens, A., Mantini, D., de Beeck, H. O., & Gillebert, C. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.838683 · Cited by 6
Hands off, brain off? A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data during active and passive driving
Navarro, J., & Reynaud, E. (2023) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.3272 · Cited by 6
Neural Correlates of Myths in Which an Image Becomes Alive
d’Huy, J. (2013) · Leonardo · doi:10.1162/leon_a_00529 · Cited by 7
Borron, K. (2000) · Land-line · Cited by 7
Concepts and Approaches to the Study of Visual Spatial Attention
Gulyaeva, A. S., & Karimova, E. (2023) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-023-01440-6 · Cited by 5
The Interplay between Auditory Attention and Working Memory
Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Gillingham, S. M., Leung, A. W. S., & Wong, J. P. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801371-7.00017-x · Cited by 5
Fatigue Leads to Dynamic Shift in Fronto-parietal Sustained Attention Network
Borghetti, L., Rhodes, L. J., & Morris, M. B. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661056 · Cited by 5
The effect of reward expectation on the time course of perceptual decisions
Tosoni, A., Committeri, G., Calluso, C., & Galati, G. (2017) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13555 · Cited by 5
Networks for Attentional Control and Selection in Spatial Vision
Mangun, G. R., & Fannon, S. P. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_21 · Cited by 5
Starr, G. G. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13829.001.0001 · Cited by 4
Specialization for different memory dimensions in brain activity evoked by cued recollection
Procida, F., Frisoni, M., Tullo, M. G., Tosoni, A., Perrucci, M. G., Chiacchiaretta, P., Guidotti, R., & Sestieri, C. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121068 · Cited by 4
Moore, K. S., Porter, C. B., & Weissman, D. H. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.042 · Cited by 4
Using visual advance information: an event-related functional MRI study
Klaver, P., Fell, J., Weis, S., de Greiff, A., Ruhlmann, J., Reul, J., Elger, C. E., & Fernández, G. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.006 · Cited by 4
Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Control
Yantis, S. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0111-4_14 · Cited by 4
Does the brain encode the gaze of others as beams emitted by their eyes?
Görner, M., Ramezanpour, H., Chong, I. D., & Thier, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2012462117 · Cited by 4
Evidence for Spinozan “Unbelieving” in the Right Inferior Prefrontal Cortex
Bernhard, R. M., Frankland, S., Plunkett, D., Sievers, B., & Greene, J. D. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01964 · Cited by 5
Im, S., Marder, M. A., Imbriano, G., Sussman, T. J., & Mohanty, A. (2021) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01562-9 · Cited by 3
Comparison of stimulus-evoked BOLD responses in human and monkey visual cortexPreprint
Patel, G. H., Cohen, A. L., Baker, J. T., Snyder, L. H., & Corbetta, M. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/345330 · Cited by 2
Self-citationPosterior brain sensorimotor recruitment for inhibition of delayed responses in children
Ciesielski, K. T. R., Bouchard, C., Solis, I., Coffman, B. A., Tofighi, D., & Pesko, J. C. (2021) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-021-06191-9 · Cited by 2
Evidence for an age-related decline in feature-based attention
Lanssens, A., Desender, K., & Gillebert, C. R. (2023) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2023.2271583 · Cited by 2
Iwakiri, M., Takeo, Y., Ikeda, T., Hara, M., & Sugata, H. (2024) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109017 · Cited by 2
Bolton, T. A. W., Jochaut, D., Giraud, A., & Ville, D. V. D. (2019) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/59083-v · Cited by 2
Cortical mechanisms of visuospatial attention in humans and monkeys
Kästner, S., Weerd, P. D., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511541681.007 · Cited by 2
A Discussion of the Role of Frontoparietal Activity in Cognition
Hon, N. (2007) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2007.267 · Cited by 1
Electrocortical correlates of control of selective attention to spatial frequency
Grent-‘t-Jong, T., Böcker, K. B. E., & Kenemans, J. L. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.067 · Cited by 2
Madary, M. (2013) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 2
Neurocognitive Findings in Bipolar Disorder
Glahn, D. C., & Bearden, C. E. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.3109/9781420021158-17 · Cited by 2
Ankeeta, A., Saxena, R., Kumaran, S. S., Dwivedi, S. N., Jagannathan, N. R., & Narang, V. (2021) · Neuro-Ophthalmology · doi:10.1080/01658107.2020.1855452 · Cited by 2
Zorzi, G., Poggiali, D., Cecchin, D., & Cagnin, A. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.04.005 · Cited by 2
Effects of Preparatory Attention to Nonspatial Features in the Visual Cortex
Fannon, S. P., & Mangun, G. R. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398451-7.00011-7 · Cited by 1
Perceptual Expectation Evokes Category
Esterman, M. S., & Yantis, S. (2010) · Cited by 1
Neurocognitive Findings in Bipolar Disorder
Glahn, D. C., & Bearden, C. E. (2007) · Medical psychiatry · doi:10.3109/9781420021158.014 · Cited by 1
Superior Attentional Efficiency of Auditory Cue via the Ventral Auditory-thalamic Pathway
Wang, K., Fang, Y., Guo, Q., Shen, L., & Chen, Q. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02090 · Cited by 1
Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit
Weidner, R., & Fink, G. R. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29800-4_19 · Cited by 1
Slagter, H. A., Kok, A., Mol, N., & Kenemans, J. L. (2005) · Cited by 1
Pahi, M. R., Cavalli, J., Nees, F., Flor, H., & Andoh, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05915 · Cited by 1
Iannoccari, G. A. (2010) · Aisberg (University of Bergamo) · doi:10.13122/iannoccari-giuseppe-alfredo_phd2010-03-05
Dependence of perceptual choice on number of response alternatives and fidelity of evidence
Ploran, E. J. (2011) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit
Weidner, R., & Fink, G. R. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68558-6_15
Melcher, T. (2006) · Publications of the UdS (Saarland University) · doi:10.22028/d291-20867
Laboratory of attention and brain recovery at Washington University, St. Louis
Sestieri, C., & Corbetta, M. (2006) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-006-0150-y
Self-citationMichelleKincade, J., & Astafiev, S. V. (2005)
Downar, J. A. (2002) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Attentional Effort - An empirical investigation of attentional capacity
Kolskår, K. K. (2013) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Greenlee, M. W. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198505822.003.0004
Neurocognitive findings in bipolar disorder: an update
Glahn, D. C., Bearden, C. E., & Frangou, S. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107477278.015
Machinskaya, R. I., Talalay, I. V., & Kurgansky, А. V. (2016) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-016-0387-6
Shulman, G. L., McAvoy, M. P., Cowan, M. C., Astafiev, S. V., Mitchell, J. P., Ruff, C. C., Bestmann, S., Blankenburg, F., Bjoertomt, O., Josephs, O., et al. (2008)
Self-citationExpect to neglect: Cross-modal resource allocation in anticipation of visual loadPreprint
Bangel, K. A., Slagter, H. A., & Mazaheri, A. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/186411
Expectation in motor planning and execution
Weinberg, I. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
A Study of Nonlinear Dynamics of EEG Responses to Simulated Unmanned Vehicle Tasks
Xu, Z. (2019) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Father, M., & Melcher, E. (2006)
Helmer, M. (2015) · doi:10.53846/goediss-5441
Brain bases of the automaticity via visual search task
Bueichekú, E. (2016) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · doi:10.6035/14023.2016.375602 · Cited by 1
Brain bases of the automaticity via visual search task
Bueichekú, E. (2016) · doi:10.6035/14109.2016.375602
(2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13829.003.0012
Implied motion guides neither gaze following nor intention attributionPreprint
Görner, M., Shafiei, M., & Thier, P. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.15.618221
Definition and Neurophysiological Structure of Attention
Coşkun, N. (2025) · Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry · doi:10.18863/pgy.1672603
Separating Component Signals of Episodic Simulation Using a Catch Trial Design
Gilmore, A. W. (2012) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/k7x63k2r
Dynamic and Integrative Properties of the Primary Visual Cortex
McManus, J. N. J. (2025) · Digital Commons - RU (Rockefeller University) · doi:10.48496/26e7-r133 · Cited by 1
Spatial Updating in Human Cortex
Merriam, E. P. (2006) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
ElShafei, H. A. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ecc35ce6zac11z429az931ez209e20c839d6
Multiscale network reorganization during the multidimensional recollection of naturalistic events
Procida, F., Tullo, M. G., Frisoni, M., Tosoni, A., Perrucci, M. G., Baldassarre, A., & Sestieri, C. (2026) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-026-03184-8
Incentive processing and inhibitory control in adolescents and young adults
Geier, C. F. (2009) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Metadata
- Authors
- Shulman, G. L., Ollinger, J. M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Petersen, S. E., & Corbetta, M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 9480-9496
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6782891
- OpenAlex
- W2156417566
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Dana Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ey012148-02, NS06833)
- National Eye Institute (EY-12148, EY003379A)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-32979, R01NS032979, P50NS006833)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- movement direction, coherent motion detection, MT, intraparietal sulcus, posterior intraparietal sulcus, superior frontal sulcus, visual motion processing, prefrontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Parietal Lobe, Putamen, Reaction Time, Thalamus, Vision, Ocular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review