Cited by 87Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Effect of Domain Interaction on Apolipoprotein E Levels in Mouse Brain

Open access
Ramaswamy, Gayathri, Xu, Qin, Huang, Yadong, Weisgraber, Karl H.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Apolipoprotein (apo) E4 is a risk factor for heart disease, Alzheimer's disease, and other forms of neurodegeneration, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Domain interaction, a structural property that distinguishes apoE4 from apoE2 and apoE3, results in more rapid turnover and lower plasma levels of apoE4. To determine whether domain interaction affects brain apoE levels, we analyzed brain homogenates from human apoE3 and apoE4 knock-in mice, wild-type mice, and Arg-61 apoE mice, in which domain interaction was introduced by gene targeting. As determined on Western blots, the hemibrain, cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum of knock-in mice had 30-40% lower levels of apoE4 than apoE3, and Arg-61 mice had 25-50% lower apoE levels than wild-type mice. In the CSF, Arg-61 apoE level was 40% lower than the wild-type level. Arg-61 apoE mRNA levels were similar to or slightly higher than wild-type apoE mRNA levels. Thus, the lower Arg-61 apoE levels were not attributable to decreased mRNA levels. In culture medium from heterozygous Arg-61/wild-type and apoE4/apoE3 primary astrocytes, Arg-61 apoE and apoE4 levels were lower than wild-type apoE and apoE3, respectively, suggesting that primary astrocytes secrete lower amounts of Arg-61 apoE and apoE4. These results demonstrate that domain interaction is responsible for the lower levels of both human apoE4 and mouse Arg-61 apoE in mouse brain. Cells may recognize apoE4 and Arg-61 apoE as misfolded proteins and target them for degradation or accumulation. Thus, degradation/accumulation or lower levels of apoE4 may contribute to the association of apoE4 with Alzheimer's disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1922-05.2005

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A detergent-rich lysis buffer has been shown to inhibit apoE oligomerization and fully release lipid-bound apoE epitopes that, if not exposed, may hamper accurate detection of apoE levels by immunoassay.

    “Such a detergent-rich lysis buffer has been shown to inhibit apoE oligomerization and fully release the lipid-bound apoE epitopes which, if not exposed, may hamper accurate detection of apoE levels by immunoassay (Krul and Cole, 1996;Ramaswamy et al., 2005).”

    From Impact of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Polymorphism on Brain ApoE Levels (2008) · cites this paper as Ramaswamy et al., 2005

    The Discussion says detergents remove bound lipid, making apoE epitopes available to antibodies, and that unexposed epitopes can affect immunoassay results. It separately says denaturing conditions prevent oligomerization; it does not establish that the detergent-rich lysis buffer alone does so. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Preferential degradation of apoE4 relative to apoE3 in astrocytes leads to a reduced capacity for delivery of cholesterol to neurons for repair.

    “the preferential degradation of apoE4 relative to apoE3 in astrocytes leads to a reduced capacity for the delivery of cholesterol the neurons for repair”

    From Impact of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Polymorphism on Brain ApoE Levels (2008) · cites this paper as Ramaswamy et al., 2005

    The astrocyte-culture results (page not provided) show less apoE4 than apoE3 in conditioned medium. The Discussion (page not provided) proposes degradation of apoE4 in astrocytes as a possibility, not an established cause. The paper does not report reduced cholesterol delivery to neurons for repair, so the claimed consequence is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several subsequent studies were able to detect a genotype-dependent difference in apoE levels (E2>E3>E4) in the brain and CSF of apoE knock-in mice.

    “However, several subsequent studies were able to detect a genotype-dependent difference in apoE levels (E2>E3>E4) in the brain and CSF of apoE knock-in mice (Fryer et al., 2005a; Mann et al., 2004; Ramaswamy et al., 2005; Riddell et al., 2008; Vitek et al., 2007).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Ramaswamy et al., 2005

    The Results section (“Lower brain levels of apoE4 than apoE3 in human knock-in mice”; page not specified in our copy) reports lower apoE4 than apoE3 levels in knock-in mouse brains. It does not establish the full E2>E3>E4 ranking. The CSF measurements described in the Discussion and Methods concern Arg-61 versus wild-type mouse apoE, not E2, E3, and E4 in human apoE knock-in mice. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Engineering an apoE4-like Arg-61 domain interaction into murine apoE affects CNS apoE biology and leads to low brain levels of apoE.

    “Recently, Ramaswamy et al. (2005) published data to suggest that engineering an apoE4-like, Arg-61 domain interaction into murine apoE also affects CNS apoE biology and leads to low brain levels of apoE.”

    From Impact of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Polymorphism on Brain ApoE Levels (2008) · cites this paper as Ramaswamy et al. (2005)

  • Detergent extraction of plasma, CSF, and brain samples before quantification precluded well-known issues of apolipoprotein detection in aqueous solutions.

    “We also detergent extracted plasma, CSF and brain samples before quantification, thus precluding well known issues of apolipoprotein detection in aqueous solutions (Krul and Cole, 1996;Ramaswamy et al., 2005).”

    From Impact of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Polymorphism on Brain ApoE Levels (2008) · cites this paper as Ramaswamy et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA (1993) Gene dose of apo- lipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. Science 261:921-923.
  2. Eichner JE, Dunn ST, Perveen G, Thompson DM, Stewart KE, Stroehla BC (2002) Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and cardiovascular disease: a HuGe review. Am J Epidemiol 155:487-495.
  3. Lippel K, Tyroler HA, Gotto Jr A, Brewer HB, Albers JJ, Scanu A, Alaupovic P (1983) Workshop on apolipoprotein quantification. Arteriosclerosis 3:452-464.
  4. Ophir G, Amariglio N, Jacob-Hirsch J, Elkon R, Rechavi G, Michaelson DM (2005) Apolipoprotein E4 enhances brain inflammation by modulation of the NF-B signaling cascade. Neurobiol Dis, in press.
  5. Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, St George-Hyslop PH, Pericak- Vance MA, Joo SH, Rosi BL, Gusella JF, Crapper-MacLachlan DR, Alberts MJ, Hulette C, Crain B, Goldgaber D, Roses AD (1993) Association of apolipoprotein E allele ⑀4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzhei- mer's disease. Neurology 43:1467-1472.
  6. Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, Roses AD (1993) Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to ␤-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1977-1981.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramaswamy, G., Xu, Q., Huang, Y., & Weisgraber, K. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Weisgraber, Karl H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-11-16
Volume
25
Issue
46
Pages
10658-10663
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2000039441
Cited by
87
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1c06rr018928-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-20235, R01AG020235)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 37063, R01HL037063)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06-RR-018928)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, domain interactions, cerebrospinal fluid, Alzheimer's disease, protein misfolding, protein degradation, APOE isoforms
MeSH terms
Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, RNA, Messenger, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Mice, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review