The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methylphenidate Enhances Working Memory by Modulating Discrete Frontal and Parietal Lobe Regions in the Human Brain
Open accessAbstract
The indirect catecholamine agonist methylphenidate (Ritalin) is the drug treatment of choice in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD), one of the most common behavioral disorders of childhood (DSM-IV), although symptoms may persist into adulthood. Methylphenidate can enhance cognitive performance in adults and children diagnosed with AD/HD (Kempton et al., 1999; Riordan et al., 1999) and also in normal human volunteers on tasks sensitive to frontal lobe damage, including aspects of spatial working memory (SWM) performance (Elliott et al., 1997). The present study investigated changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) induced by methylphenidate during performance of a self-ordered SWM task to define the neuroanatomical loci of the beneficial effect of the drug. The results show that the methylphenidate-induced improvements in working memory performance occur with task-related reductions in rCBF in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex. The beneficial effects of methylphenidate on working memory were greatest in the subjects with lower baseline working memory capacity. This is to our knowledge the first demonstration of a localization of a drug-induced improvement in SWM performance in humans and has relevance for understanding the treatment of AD/HD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, imaging studies have shown that methylphenidate enhances the efficiency of PFC activity both in healthy college students (Mehta et al., 2000) and in subjects with ADHD (Bush et al., 2008).”
From Catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical function: Relevance to treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and related disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Mehta et al., 2000
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research additionally shows that ADHD is associated with decreased activity in frontal brain areas and increased activity in posterior (parietal and occipital) brain areas (Durston, 2003), and that MPH affects not only frontal but also posterior areas (Mehta et al., 2000).”
From Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD (2008) · cites this paper as Mehta et al., 2000
In the citing paper
“Based on accumulating evidence that effects of methylphenidate and related drugs on cognition are baseline performance-dependent (Kimberg et al., 1997; Mattay et al., 2000; Mehta et al., 2000; Gibbs and D’Esposito, 2005; Tipper et al., 2005; Finke et al., 2010), changes in sustained attention following methylphenidate were assessed as a function of baseline A’ scores, independent of group.”
From A positron emission tomography study of nigro-striatal dopaminergic mechanisms underlying attention: implications for ADHD and its treatment (2013) · cites this paper as Mehta et al., 2000
In the citing paper
“The effects of methylphenidate and related stimulant drugs in healthy individuals have been shown to be baseline-dependent; i.e. those subjects with relatively low performance levels exhibit greater benefit after the drug (Naylor et al., 1985; Rogers et al., 1999; Mehta et al., 2000; Turner et al., 2003; Clatworthy et al., 2009).”
From A positron emission tomography study of nigro-striatal dopaminergic mechanisms underlying attention: implications for ADHD and its treatment (2013) · cites this paper as Mehta et al., 2000
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings
BOND, A., & LADER, M. (1974) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x · Cited by 1,972
Vaidya, C. J., Austin, G., Kirkorian, G., Ridlehuber, H. W., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14494 · Cited by 845
Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.20.12061 · Cited by 806
Owen, A. M., Evans, A. C., & Petrides, M. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.1.31 · Cited by 756
Self-citationPetrides, M., Alivisatos, B., Evans, A. C., & Meyer, E. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.3.873 · Cited by 660
Architecture of the Prefrontal Cortex and the Central Executive
Goldman, P. S. (1995) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38132.x · Cited by 654
Arnsten, A. F. T., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999977 · Cited by 549
Catecholamine regulation of the prefrontal cortex
Arnsten, A. F. T. (1997) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/026988119701100208 · Cited by 493
Effects of putative neurotransmitters on neuronal activity in monkey auditory cortex
Foote, S. L., Freedman, R., & Oliver, A. P. (1975) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(75)90699-x · Cited by 458
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Baddeley AD (1986) Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.
- Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs. New York: Wiley.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MARTINUSSEN, R., HAYDEN, J., HOGG-JOHNSON, S., & TANNOCK, R. (2005) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000153228.72591.73 · Cited by 1,297
Putting brain training to the test
Owen, A. M., Hampshire, A., Grahn, J. A., Stenton, R., Dajani, S., Burns, A. S., Howard, R. J., & Ballard, C. G. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09042 · Cited by 1,056
Self-citationInverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory
Vijayraghavan, S., Wang, M., Birnbaum, S. G., Williams, G. V., & Arnsten, A. F. T. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1846 · Cited by 1,013
“The reduction in processing of 'noise' by D1R stimulation seen in the current study is consonant with results observed in imaging studies of human subjects performing working memory tasks, whereby cognition-enhancing doses of stimulant medication actually reduce the area of PFC activated by task demands, thus enhancin…”
ResultNeurobiology of Executive Functions: Catecholamine Influences on Prefrontal Cortical Functions
Arnsten, A. F. T., & Li, B.-M. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.019 · Cited by 948
Cools, R. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.12.1136 · Cited by 906
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehta, M. A., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., Mavaddat, N., Pickard, J. D., & Robbins, T. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-03-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- RC65-RC65
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6772505
- OpenAlex
- W2170595219
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- methylphenidate, working memory, spatial working memory, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, regional cerebral blood flow, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, catecholamine agonists, working memory capacity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Methylphenidate, Parietal Lobe, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
