Cited by 88Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Methylphenidate increased regional cerebral blood flow in subjects with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Kim, Boong Nyun, Lee, Jae Sung, Cho, Soo Churl, Lee, Dong Soo·2001·Yonsei Medical Journal

Abstract

The regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) responses to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment were examined in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Thirty-two male children, diagnosed with ADHD by the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, other behavioral assessment scales and neuropsychological battery, were studied using 99mTc-HMPAO-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Subjects were studied before and after MPH treatment. First, using an image subtraction method, we obtained a NDR parametric image of each patient and found increased cerebral blood flow in the frontal lobes, caudate nuclei and thalamic areas after treatment. When the changes in SPECT and clinical response were compared, the matching rate, sensitivity and specificity between them were found to be 77.1, 80.0 and 79.2%, respectively. Second, three transaxial brain slices delineating anatomically defined regions of interest (ROI) at 20, 40, and 60mm above the orbitomeatal line (OML) were used, with the average number of counts for each region of interest normalized to the area of the cerebellar maximal uptake. The left and right prefrontal areas, and caudate and thalamic areas showed significant increases in rCBF after MPH treatment. These findings suggested MPH could affect the function of the fronto-striato-thalamic circuit, which is known as the pathophysiologic site of ADHD and could be used to correct the underlying brain dysfunction of ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3349/ymj.2001.42.1.19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with methylphenidate normalizes the hypoperfusion of prefrontal areas and is associated with corresponding improvement in ADHD symptoms.

    “treatment with methylphenidate normalizes the hypoperfusion of prefrontal areas and is associated with corresponding improvement in ADHD symptoms [60][61][62][63][64][65].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, B. N., Lee, J. S., Cho, S. C., & Lee, D. S.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
Yonsei Medical Journal
Published
2001
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
19
ISSN
0513-5796 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036043437
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Yonsei Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, regional cerebral blood flow, 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT, caudate nucleus, thalamus, prefrontal cortex, children, treatment response, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review