Cited by 152Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disorders

Circadian and homeostatic control of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep: promotion of REM tendency by the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Open access
Wurts, Sarah W., Edgar, Dale M.·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The daily timing of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep reflects an interaction between the circadian pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN) and a homeostatic process that induces compensatory REM sleep in response to REM sleep loss. Whether the circadian variation in REM sleep propensity is caused by active promotion, inhibition, or passive gating of REM sleep homeostasis by the SCN is unknown. To investigate these possibilities, compensatory responses to 24 hr REM sleep deprivation (RSD) were compared between SCN-lesioned (SCNx) and sham-lesioned rats at different times of day in constant dark. The attempts to enter REM sleep (REM tendency) increased during RSD in all rats and were modulated by circadian phase in sham-lesioned, but not SCNx rats. REM sleep homeostasis interacted with circadian time, such that REM tendency doubled during the rest phase in sham-lesioned rats relative to SCNx rats (F(6,93)= 17.9;p= 0.0001). However, REM tendency was indistinguishable between SCNx and sham-lesioned rats during the activity phase, suggesting the SCN does not inhibit REM tendency at this time. By contrast, the amount of compensatory REM sleep examined 2, 6, 12, or 24 hr after RSD did not depend on circadian phase. Thus, transitions into REM sleep are facilitated by the SCN during the rest phase, but the amount of REM sleep, once initiated, is determined primarily by homeostatic mechanisms. This work supports a role for the SCN in the active promotion of REM sleep at specific times of day.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-11-04300.2000

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increase in REM density with higher EEG fast-frequencies are recognized as the main neurophysiological correlates of depression during sleep.

    “For instance, awakenings from REM sleep are associated to higher scores in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (McNamara et al., 2010), and the increase in REM density (Riemann et al., 1994; Wurts and Edgar, 2000) with higher EEG fast-frequencies (Riemann et al., 1994) have been recognized as the main neurophysiological correlates of depression during sleep.”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Wurts and Edgar, 2000

    The Study design and data analysis section (page unavailable) identifies REM sleep duration and REM sleep tendency as measures in rats, but does not identify REM density as a measure. Searches for REM density and depression found no passage linking increased REM density to depression; the higher EEG fast-frequencies clause is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bracewell RN (1986) The hartley transform. New York: Oxford UP.
  2. Watts AG (1991) The efferent projections of the suprachiasmatic nu- cleus: anatomical insights into the control of circadian rhythms. In: Suprachiasmatic nucleus: the mind's clock (Klein DC, Moore RY, Reppert SM, eds), pp 77-106. New York: Oxford UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wurts, S. W., & Edgar, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
4300-4310
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1926588156
Cited by
152
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01ag011084-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-11084)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH011660, MH11660)
  • National Cancer Institute (R33CA094304)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620, F49620-95-1-0388)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
REM sleep, suprachiasmatic nucleus, circadian rhythm, REM sleep deprivation, circadian phase, hypothalamus, sleep regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Body Temperature, Circadian Rhythm, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Homeostasis, Male, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep, REM, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review