The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features
Open accessAbstract
Though other species of primates also use tools, humans appear unique in their capacity to understand the causal relationship between tools and the result of their use. In a comparative fMRI study, we scanned a large cohort of human volunteers and untrained monkeys, as well as two monkeys trained to use tools, while they observed hand actions and actions performed using simple tools. In both species, the observation of an action, regardless of how performed, activated occipitotemporal, intraparietal, and ventral premotor cortex, bilaterally. In humans, the observation of actions done with simple tools yielded an additional, specific activation of a rostral sector of the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). This latter site was considered human-specific, as it was not observed in monkey IPL for any of the tool videos presented, even after monkeys had become proficient in using a rake or pliers through extensive training. In conclusion, while the observation of a grasping hand activated similar regions in humans and monkeys, an additional specific sector of IPL devoted to tool use has evolved in Homo sapiens, although tool-specific neurons might reside in the monkey grasping regions. These results shed new light on the changes of the hominid brain during evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433
Self-citationThe cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Poline, J.-B., Grasby, P. J., Williams, S. C. R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 · Cited by 2,502
Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H. ‐. (2001) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x · Cited by 2,488
Self-citationWhiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Boesch, C. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21415 · Cited by 2,341
Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106138 · Cited by 1,990
Self-citationKöhler, W. (1948) · Readings in the history of psychology. · doi:10.1037/11304-054 · Cited by 1,582
Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones
lriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 4×
“The rake, or the pliers, might simply become, with training, a prolongation of the arm, as shown by the response properties of neurons recorded from the medial wall of the IPS of these trained monkeys (Iriki et al., 1996; Hihara et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2805 · Cited by 1,680
Self-citationMirror neurons: from origin to function
Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13000903 · Cited by 647
Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution
Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0099 · Cited by 329
Visual motion serves but is not under the purview of the dorsal pathway
Gilaie-Dotan, S. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.018 · Cited by 325
Mirror neurons: from discovery to autism
Rizzolatti, G., & Fabbri-Destro, M. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2002-3 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peeters, R., Simone, L., Nelissen, K., Fabbri-Destro, M., Vanduffel, W., Rizzolatti, G., & Orban, G. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-09-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 11523-11539
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1968024137
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 29.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2040-09.2009
- The paper
- Peeters, R., Simone, L., Nelissen, K., Fabbri-Destro, M., Vanduffel, W., Rizzolatti, G., & Orban, G. A. (2009). The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2040-09.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
