Cited by 2,488Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationTactile and Sensory Interactions

Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study

Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K. +2 more·2001·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to localize brain areas that were active during the observation of actions made by another individual. Object‐ and non‐object‐related actions made with different effectors (mouth, hand and foot) were presented. Observation of both object‐ and non‐object‐related actions determined a somatotopically organized activation of premotor cortex. The somatotopic pattern was similar to that of the classical motor cortex homunculus. During the observation of object‐related actions, an activation, also somatotopically organized, was additionally found in the posterior parietal lobe. Thus, when individuals observe an action, an internal replica of that action is automatically generated in their premotor cortex. In the case of object‐related actions, a further object‐related analysis is performed in the parietal lobe, as if the subjects were indeed using those objects. These results bring the previous concept of an action observation/execution matching system (mirror system) into a broader perspective: this system is not restricted to the ventral premotor cortex, but involves several somatotopically organized motor circuits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H. ‐.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
400-404
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1970287153
Cited by
2,488
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 122 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 159
FWCI
108.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
action observation, mirror system, premotor cortex, posterior parietal cortex, somatotopic organization, homunculus, effectors, motor simulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Cortex, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review