Cited by 228Mind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and MemoryFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

When the Brain Takes a Break: A Model-Based Analysis of Mind Wandering

Open access
Mittner, Matthias, Boekel, Wouter, Tucker, Adrienne M., Turner, Brandon M., Heathcote, Andrew, Forstmann, Birte U.·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Mind wandering is an ubiquitous phenomenon in everyday life. In the cognitive neurosciences, mind wandering has been associated with several distinct neural processes, most notably increased activity in the default mode network (DMN), suppressed activity within the anti-correlated (task-positive) network (ACN), and changes in neuromodulation. By using an integrative multimodal approach combining machine-learning techniques with modeling of latent cognitive processes, we show that mind wandering in humans is characterized by inefficiencies in executive control (task-monitoring) processes. This failure is predicted by a single-trial signature of (co)activations in the DMN, ACN, and neuromodulation, and accompanied by a decreased rate of evidence accumulation and response thresholds in the cognitive model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2062-14.2014

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In methamphetamine abusers, a specific deficit in inhibiting proponent motor responses during the stop signal task and cognitive inhibition in the Stroop task was observed.

    “For example, a specific deficit in inhibiting proponent motor responses during the stop signal task (Mittner et al. 2014) as well as cognitive inhibition in the Stroop task (Lynn et al. 2014; Ganos et al. 2014) was observed in methamphetamine abusers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittner, M., Boekel, W., Tucker, A. M., Turner, B. M., Heathcote, A., & Forstmann, B. U.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
34
Issue
49
Pages
16286-16295
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2059427866
Cited by
228
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 8
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Bentham-Moxon Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Australian Research Council (DP120102907, DP110100234)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM103288)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
mind wandering, default mode network, task-positive network, executive function, task monitoring, neuromodulation, evidence accumulation, response threshold, cognitive models
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Pupil, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review