Cited by 11Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMultisensory perception and integration

A Strong Constraint to the Joint Processing of Pairs of Cortical Signals

Open access
Ghose, Kaushik, Maunsell, John H. R.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

An important question in neuroscience is how the activity from spatially distributed cortical representations is integrated and processed together. In this study, we used a new approach to investigate the integration of distributed cortical activity. We used microstimulation to directly activate pairs of sites in primary visual cortex of rhesus monkeys. The sites were activated either singly or jointly, and the monkeys were trained to behaviorally report detection of the activation of either cortical site. We compared the detection performance with predictions from two different mathematical models of signal combination. Our data show that, at cortical separations <1 mm, signal integration is well described as a linear combination (d' summation) of individual site activity. At larger separations, signal integration is better described as a maximum operation on the site signals. We compare our neurophysiological findings to existing psychophysical data and suggest the intriguing possibility that cortical activity originating at spatial separations greater than ∼1 mm is processed as if by parallel, independent circuits whose signals can be compared against each other but not summed. This in turn implies that there is a strong constraint to the kinds of computations the brain can perform with spatially distributed cortical activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2186-12.2012

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The assumptions of independence and linear summation seem to hold for intracortical electrodes separated by more than 1 mm.

    “These assumptions seem to hold for intracortical electrodes separated by more than 1 mm (Ghose and Maunsell, 2012), but may underestimate the complexities observed when electrodes are nearer.”

    From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Ghose and Maunsell, 2012

    The Discussion says linear summation is consistent with sites within 1 mm, whereas sites at greater distances are consistent with a MAX operation on individual signals. Independent processing at greater distances is consistent with the paper, but the claim that linear summation also holds there reverses its central finding. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Afraz SR Kiani R Esteky H 2006 Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization Nature 442 7103 692 5 16878143
  2. Behrens TEJ Sporns O 2012 Human connectomics Current opinion in neurobiology 22 1 144 53 21908183 PMC3294015
  3. Chen Y Geisler WS Seidemann E 2006 Optimal decoding of correlated neural population responses in the primate visual cortex Nature neuroscience 9 11 1412 20 PMC1851689 17057706
  4. de Lafuente V Romo R 2006 Neural correlate of subjective sensory experience gradually builds up across cortical areas Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 39 14266 71 16924098 PMC1551903
  5. Deangelis GC Newsome WT 2004 Perceptual “read-out” of conjoined direction and disparity maps in extrastriate area mt PLoS biology 2 3 E77 15024425 PMC368171
  6. Duda RO Hart PE Stork DG 2001 Pattern classification Wiley-Interscience New York
  7. Ghose GM Maunsell JHR 2008 Spatial summation can explain the attentional modulation of neuronal responses to multiple stimuli in area v4 The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 28 19 5115 26 18463265 PMC2720676
  8. Gold JI Shadlen MN 2007 The neural basis of decision making Annual review of neuroscience 30 535 74 17600525
  9. Goldman-Rakic PS 1988 Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex Annual review of neuroscience 11 137 56 3284439
  10. Green DM Swets JA 1966 Signal detection theory and psychophysics Wiley New York
  11. Grinvald A Lieke EE Frostig RD Hildesheim R 1994 Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 14 5 Pt 1 2545 68 8182427 PMC6577512
  12. Histed MH Bonin V Reid RC 2009 Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation Neuron 63 4 508 22 19709632 PMC2874753
  13. Hubel DH Wiesel TN 1974 Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor The Journal of comparative neurology 158 3 295 305 4436457
  14. Kelly RC Smith MA Samonds JM Kohn A Bonds AB Movshon JA Lee TS 2007 Comparison of recordings from microelectrode arrays and single electrodes in the visual cortex The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27 2 261 4 17215384 PMC3039847
  15. Kröse BJ Julesz B 1989 The control and speed of shifts of attention Vision research 29 11 1607 19 2635484
  16. Lassonde M Ouimet C 2010 The split-brain Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1 191 202 26271234
  17. Maass W 2000 On the computational power of winner-take-all Neural computation 12 11 2519 35 11110125
  18. Maynard EM Nordhausen CT Normann RA 1997 The utah intracortical electrode array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 102 3 228 39 9129578
  19. Ni AM Maunsell JHR 2010 Microstimulation reveals limits in detecting different signals from a local cortical region Current biology: CB PMC2879058 20381351
  20. Nichols MJ Newsome WT 2002 Middle temporal visual area microstimulation influences veridical judgments of motion direction The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 22 21 9530 40 12417677 PMC6758031
  21. Oleksiak A Klink PC Postma A van der Ham IJM Lankheet MJ van Wezel RJA 2011 Spatial summation in macaque parietal area 7a follows a winner-take-all rule Journal of neurophysiology 105 3 1150 8 21177995
  22. Parkes L Lund J Angelucci A Solomon JA Morgan M 2001 Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision Nature neuroscience 4 7 739 44 11426231
  23. Pelli DG 1985 Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science 2 9 1508 32 4045584
  24. Pelli DG Burns CW Farell B Moore-page DC 2006 Feature detection and letter identification Vision research 46 28 4646 74 16808957
  25. Pelli DG Farell B Moore DC 2003 The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition Nature 423 6941 752 6 12802334
  26. Riesenhuber M Poggio T 1999 Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex Nature neuroscience 2 11 1019 25 10526343
  27. Rolls ET Aggelopoulos NC Zheng F 2003 The receptive fields of inferior temporal cortex neurons in natural scenes The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 23 1 339 48 12514233 PMC6742126
  28. Roskies AL 1999 The binding problem Neuron 24 1 7 9 111 25 10677022
  29. Sachs MB Nachmias J Robson JG 1971 Spatial-frequency channels in human vision Journal of the Optical Society of America 61 9 1176 86 5121888
  30. Simpson A Fitter M 1973 What is the best index of detectability? Psychological bulletin 80 6 481 488
  31. Singer W Gray CM 1995 Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis Annual review of neuroscience 18 555 86 7605074
  32. Snippe HP Koenderink JJ 1992 Information in channel-coded systems: correlated receivers Biological cybernetics 67 2 183 90 1627687
  33. Stettler DD Das A Bennett J Gilbert CD 2002 Lateral connectivity and contextual interactions in macaque primary visual cortex Neuron 36 4 739 50 12441061
  34. Stoney SD Thompson WD Asanuma H 1968 Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current Journal of neurophysiology 31 5 659 69 5711137
  35. Tehovnik EJ Tolias AS Sultan F Slocum WM Logothetis NK 2006 Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation Journal of neurophysiology 96 2 512 21 16835359
  36. Ts’o DY Zarella M Burkitt G 2009 Whither the hypercolumn? Journal of Physiology 587 12 2791 805 19525564 PMC2718239
  37. Van Essen DC Newsome WT Maunsell JH 1984 The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability Vision research 24 5 429 48 6740964
  38. Williams ZM Elfar JC Eskandar EN Toth LJ Assad JA 2003 Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion Nature neuroscience 6 6 616 23 12730699
  39. Wuerger SM Hofbauer M Meyer GF 2003 The integration of auditory and visual motion signals at threshold Perception and psychophysics 65 8 1188 96 14710954
  40. Zamora-López G Zhou C Kurths J 2011 Exploring brain function from anatomical connectivity Frontiers in neuroscience 5 83 21734863 PMC3124130
  41. Zeki S Bartels A 1999 Toward a theory of visual consciousness Consciousness and cognition 8 2 225 59 10448004
  42. Zoccolan D Cox DD DiCarlo JJ 2005 Multiple object response normalization in monkey inferotemporal cortex The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 25 36 8150 64 16148223 PMC6725538

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghose, K., & Maunsell, J. H. R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-11-07
Volume
32
Issue
45
Pages
15922-15933
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2074135419
Cited by
11
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY005911)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
primary visual cortex, microstimulation, signal integration, spatial separation, rhesus monkeys, visual detection
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Electroencephalography, Macaca mulatta, Male, Models, Neurological, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review