Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Additive Effect of Stress and Drug Cues on Reinstatement of Ethanol Seeking: Exacerbation by History of Dependence and Role of Concurrent Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Opioid Mechanisms

Open access
Liu, Xiu, Weiss, Friedbert·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Stress and exposure to drug-related environmental stimuli have been implicated as critical factors in relapse to drug use. What has received little attention, however, is the significance of interactions between these factors for motivating drug-seeking behavior. To address this issue, a reinstatement model of relapse was used. Footshock stress and response-contingent presentation of an ethanol-associated light cue, acting as a conditioned stimulus (CS), effectively reinstated extinguished responding at a previously active, drug-paired lever in male Wistar rats. When response-contingent availability of the ethanol CS was preceded by footshock, additive effects of these stimuli on responding were observed. Both the individual and interactive effects of footshock and the CS were significantly greater in previously ethanol-dependent than in nondependent rats. Responding induced by the ethanol CS was selectively reversed by the nonselective opiate antagonist naltrexone, whereas the effects of footshock were selectively reversed by the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist d-Phe-CRF(12-41). However, both agents only partially reversed the enhanced drug-seeking response produced by the interactive effects of stress and the ethanol CS; full reversal required coadministration of d-Phe-CRF and naltrexone. The results document that stress and drug-related environmental stimuli interact to augment the resumption of drug seeking after extinction and suggest that this effect results from concurrent activation of opioid and CRF transmission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-18-07856.2002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., & Weiss, F.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-09-15
Volume
22
Issue
18
Pages
7856-7861
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1921355205
Cited by
359
References
2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive Effect of Stress and Drug Cues on Reinstatement of Ethanol Seeking: Exacerbation by History of Dependence and Role of Concurrent Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Opioid Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.22-18-07856.2002
The paper
Liu, X., & Weiss, F. (2002). Additive Effect of Stress and Drug Cues on Reinstatement of Ethanol Seeking: Exacerbation by History of Dependence and Role of Concurrent Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Opioid Mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.22-18-07856.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.