The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Areas in Macaque Cortex Measured Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Open accessAbstract
We describe the first systematic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements of visual field maps in macaque visual cortex. The boundaries of visual areas V1, V2, V3, V3A, V4, MT/V5, and TEO/V4A were identified using stimuli that create traveling waves of activity in retinotopically organized areas of the visual cortex. Furthermore, these stimuli were used to measure the dimensions of the representations of the central 11 degrees in V1-V3, quantitative visual field eccentricity functions for V1-V3 and MT, and the distribution of foveal and peripheral signals within the occipital lobe. Within areas V1, V2, MT, and portions of V4, the fMRI signals were 5-10 times the noise level (3 mm3 volumes of interest). Signals were weaker but still significant in other cortical regions, including V3, V3A, and TEO. There is good agreement between the fMRI maps and the visual area maps discovered using local anatomical and physiological measurements. The fMRI measurements allow one to obtain a broad view of the distribution of cortical signals, spanning multiple visual areas at a single point in time. The combination of scale and sensitivity demonstrated here create a good foundation for measuring how localized signals and lesions influence the responses and reorganization in widely separated cortical regions. The ability to measure human and macaque maps using the same technology will make it possible to define computational homologies between the two species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
Self-citation
Cited by
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Logothetis, N. K., & Wandell, B. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.082602.092845 · Cited by 1,568
Self-citationVisual field maps in human cortex.
Wandell, B. A., Dumoulin, S. O., & Brewer, A. A. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012 · Cited by 1,231
The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach
Glasser, M. F., Smith, S. M., Marcus, D. S., Andersson, J. L. R., Auerbach, E. J., Behrens, T. E. J., Coalson, T. S., Harms, M. P., Jenkinson, M., Moeller, S., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4361 · Cited by 1,090
Shmuel, A., Augath, M., Oeltermann, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1675 · Cited by 898
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, A. A., Press, W. A., Logothetis, N. K., & Wandell, B. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 10416-10426
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1586648108
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Areas in Macaque Cortex Measured Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.22-23-10416.2002
- The paper
- Brewer, A. A., Press, W. A., Logothetis, N. K., & Wandell, B. A. (2002). Visual Areas in Macaque Cortex Measured Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.22-23-10416.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.