Cited by 37Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

Geometric Cues Influence Head Direction Cells Only Weakly in Nondisoriented Rats

Open access
Knight, Rebecca, Hayman, Robin, Lin Ginzberg, Lin, Jeffery, Kathryn·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The influential hypothesis that environmental geometry is critical for spatial orientation has been extensively tested behaviorally, and yet findings have been conflicting. Head direction (HD) cells, the neural correlate of the sense of direction, offer a window into the processes underlying directional orientation and may help clarify the issue. In the present study, HD cells were recorded as rats foraged in enclosures of varying geometry, with or without simultaneous manipulation of landmarks and self-motion cues (path integration). All geometric enclosures had single-order rotational symmetry and thus completely polarized the environment. They also had unique features, such as corners, which could, in principle, act as landmarks. Despite these strongly polarizing geometric cues, HD cells in nondisoriented rats never rotated with these shapes. In contrast, when a cue card (white or gray) was added to one wall, HD cells readily rotated with the enclosure. When path integration was disrupted by disorienting the rat, HD cells rotated with the enclosure even without the landmark. Collectively, these findings indicate that geometry exerts little or no influence on heading computations in nondisoriented rats, but it can do so in disoriented rats. We suggest that geometric processing is only a weak influence, providing a backup system for heading calculations and recruited only under conditions of disorientation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2257-11.2011

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Berens P CircStat: A MATLAB Toolbox for Circular Statistics Journal of Statistical Software 2009 31 1 21
  2. Kubie J Ranck J-B Jr Seifert W Sensory-behavioral correlates in individual hippocampus neurons in three situations: Space and context The Hippocampus 1983 433 447 Academic Press New York
  3. Redish AD Touretzky DS Touretzky DS Mozer MC Modeling interactions of the rat’s place and head direction systems Advances in neural information processing systems 8 1996 61 67 MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knight, R., Hayman, R., Lin Ginzberg, L., & Jeffery, K.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jeffery, Kathryn
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-11-02
Volume
31
Issue
44
Pages
15681-15692
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2080289632
Cited by
37
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (EU-FP7-, 083540)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
head direction cells, environmental geometry, spatial orientation, path integration, landmark cues, self-motion cues, disorientation, rotational symmetry, rats, cue cards
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Confusion, Cues, Male, Motion Perception, Neurons, Orientation, Rotation, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Head Movements, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review