Cited by 921Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsGeography Education and Pedagogy

The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond

Open access
Epstein, Russell A, Patai, Eva Zita, Julian, Joshua B, Spiers, Hugo J·2017·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The 'cognitive map' hypothesis proposes that brain builds a unified representation of the spatial environment to support memory and guide future action. Forty years of electrophysiological research in rodents suggest that cognitive maps are neurally instantiated by place, grid, border and head direction cells in the hippocampal formation and related structures. Here we review recent work that suggests a similar functional organization in the human brain and yields insights into how cognitive maps are used during spatial navigation. Specifically, these studies indicate that (i) the human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex support map-like spatial codes, (ii) posterior brain regions such as parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices provide critical inputs that allow cognitive maps to be anchored to fixed environmental landmarks, and (iii) hippocampal and entorhinal spatial codes are used in conjunction with frontal lobe mechanisms to plan routes during navigation. We also discuss how these three basic elements of cognitive map based navigation-spatial coding, landmark anchoring and route planning-might be applied to nonspatial domains to provide the building blocks for many core elements of human thought.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4656

Cites

154 of 154 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For natural environments, memory of spatial navigational episodes mostly occurs against the backdrop of semantic knowledge and patterns extracted from previous experiences that shape expectations and guide behaviour.

    “For natural environments, memory of spatial navigational episodes mostly occurs against the backdrop of semantic knowledge and patterns extracted from previous experiences that shape our expectations and guide actual behaviour2,5.”

    From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    In “Navigating the past and the future” (page unavailable), the review says route planning uses representations laid down in the past and links the navigational system to episodic memory and prospective thinking. It does not establish that memories of spatial navigational episodes in natural environments mostly occur against a backdrop of semantic knowledge, or that patterns extracted from previous experiences generally shape expectations and actual behaviour. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Memory of navigational episodes emerges from the interaction of multiple parallel spatial representations, each supported by a widespread hippocampal-neocortical network.

    “Taken together, our findings suggest that memory of navigational episodes emerges from the interaction of multiple parallel spatial representations, each supported by a widespread hippocampal–neocortical network2,5,38.”

    From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    In “Representing space: Maps, Grids, and Contexts” (page unavailable), the review describes multiple spatial maps and roles for both hippocampal and neocortical regions in spatial memory. It calls how those regions interact to support different kinds of spatial knowledge an open question; it does not establish that each parallel representation is supported by a widespread hippocampal–neocortical network. The emergence of navigational-episode memory is framed in the citing sentence as the citing authors’ own inference. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Animal navigation research posits that organisms build and maintain internal spatial representations (maps) of their environment that enable them to determine and follow task-appropriate paths.

    “Animal navigation research posits that organisms build and maintain internal spa- tial representations, or maps, of their environment.”

    From Emergence of Maps in the Memories of Blind Navigation Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Epstein et al., 2017

  • In humans, generalizable spatial representations support interpretation of sensory input, anticipation of future events, and flexible adaptation to changing environments.

    “In humans, generalizable spatial representations support interpretation of sensory input, anticipation of future events, and flexible adaptation to changing environments, from brewing coffee in a familiar kitchen to navigating an unfamiliar city3–5.”

    From Brain-inspired spatial intelligence for embodied agents (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Structured spatial memory is essential for guiding goal-directed behavior in complex real-world environments.

    “Structured spatial memory is essential for guiding goal-directed behavior in complex real-world environments3–5, yet remains largely absent from current embodied agents.”

    From Brain-inspired spatial intelligence for embodied agents (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Epstein, Russell A
  • Spiers, Hugo J
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2017-11
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1504-1513
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2765123421
Cited by
921
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 125 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (094850/Z/10/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY022350, R21EY027047)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
cognitive maps, spatial navigation, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, place cells, grid cells, border cells, head direction cells, route planning, parahippocampal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, frontal lobe, spatial memory
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review