Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction of Cellular Prion and Stress-Inducible Protein 1 Promotes Neuritogenesis and Neuroprotection by Distinct Signaling Pathways

Open access
Lopes, Marilene H., Hajj, Glaucia N. M., Muras, Angelita G., Mancini, Gabriel L., Castro, Rosa M. P. S., Ribeiro, Karina C. B., Brentani, Ricardo R., Linden, Rafael, Martins, Vilma R.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Understanding the physiological function of the cellular prion (PrP c) depends on the investigation of PrP c-interacting proteins. Stress-inducible protein 1 (STI1) is a specific PrP c ligand that promotes neuroprotection of retinal neurons through cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA). Here, we examined the signaling pathways and functional consequences of the PrP c interaction with STI1 in hippocampal neurons. Both PrP c and STI1 are abundantly expressed and highly colocalized in the hippocampus in situ, indicating that they can interact in vivo. Recombinant STI1 (His 6-STI1) added to hippocampal cultures interacts with PrP c at the neuronal surface and elicits neuritogenesis in wild-type neurons but not in PrP c-null cells. This effect was abolished by antibodies against either PrP c or STI1 and was dependent on the STI1 domain that binds PrP c. Binding of these proteins induced the phosphorylation/activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase, which was essential for STI1-promoted neuritogenesis. His 6-STI1, but not its counterpart lacking the PrP c binding site, prevented cell death via PKA activation. These results demonstrate that two parallel effects of the PrP c–STI1 interaction, neuritogenesis and neuroprotection, are mediated by distinct signaling pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2313-05.2005

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Lopes, M. H., Hajj, G. N. M., Muras, A. G., Mancini, G. L., Castro, R. M. P. S., Ribeiro, K. C. B., Brentani, R. R., Linden, R., & Martins, V. R.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-12-07
Volume
25
Issue
49
Pages
11330-11339
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2127981299
Cited by
286
References
44
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of Cellular Prion and Stress-Inducible Protein 1 Promotes Neuritogenesis and Neuroprotection by Distinct Signaling Pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2313-05.2005
The paper
Lopes, M. H., Hajj, G. N. M., Muras, A. G., Mancini, G. L., Castro, R. M. P. S., Ribeiro, K. C. B., Brentani, R. R., Linden, R., & Martins, V. R. (2005). Interaction of Cellular Prion and Stress-Inducible Protein 1 Promotes Neuritogenesis and Neuroprotection by Distinct Signaling Pathways. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2313-05.2005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.