Cited by 81Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Synaptic strength is bidirectionally controlled by opposing activity-dependent regulation of Nedd4-1 and USP8

Open access
Scudder, Samantha L., Goo, Marisa S., Cartier, Anna E., Molteni, Alice, Schwarz, Lindsay A., Wright, Rebecca, Patrick, Gentry N.·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The trafficking of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) to and from synapses is crucial for synaptic plasticity. Previous work has demonstrated that AMPARs undergo activity-dependent ubiquitination by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-1, which promotes their internalization and degradation in lysosomes. Here, we define the molecular mechanisms involved in ubiquitination and deubiquitination of AMPARs. We report that Nedd4-1 is rapidly redistributed to dendritic spines in response to AMPAR activation and not in response to NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation in cultured rat neurons. In contrast, NMDAR activation directly antagonizes Nedd4-1 function by promoting the deubiquitination of AMPARs. We show that NMDAR activation causes the rapid dephosphorylation and activation of the deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) USP8. Surface AMPAR levels and synaptic strength are inversely regulated by Nedd4-1 and USP8. Strikingly, we show that homeostatic downscaling of synaptic strength is accompanied by an increase and decrease in Nedd4-1 and USP8 protein levels, respectively. Furthermore, we show that Nedd4-1 is required for homeostatic loss of surface AMPARs and downscaling of synaptic strength. This study provides the first mechanistic evidence for rapid and opposing activity-dependent control of a ubiquitin ligase and DUB at mammalian CNS synapses. We propose that the dynamic regulation of these opposing forces is critical in maintaining synapses and scaling them during homeostatic plasticity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2452-14.2014

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bicuculline treatment stimulates GluA2 ubiquitination on K882, and AMPAR ubiquitination has been shown to be required for homeostatic scaling-down.

    “Bicuculline treatment stimulates GluA2 ubiquitination on K882 (Widagdo et al., 2015), very close to the Y876 and S880 phosphorylation sites, and AMPAR ubiquitination has been shown to be required for homeostatic scaling-down (Scudder et al., 2014).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Scudder et al., 2014

    In the section on homeostatic downscaling (pages not supplied), the paper reports increased AMPAR ubiquitination after bicuculline treatment and shows that Nedd4-1 knockdown prevents downscaling of surface AMPARs and synaptic strength. It establishes that Nedd4-1 is required, but does not directly show that ubiquitination of AMPARs themselves is required. The GluA2 K882 claim is attributed to a different citation and is not part of this verdict. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scudder, S. L., Goo, M. S., Cartier, A. E., Molteni, A., Schwarz, L. A., Wright, R., & Patrick, G. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-12-10
Volume
34
Issue
50
Pages
16637-16649
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1990587513
Cited by
81
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P50-GMO85764)
  • National Institute on Aging (T-32-AG-00216, T32AG000216)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50GM085764)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS060847, NS060847)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
AMPA receptor trafficking, NEDD4-1, USP8, ubiquitination, deubiquitination, synaptic plasticity, homeostatic synaptic scaling, dendritic spines, NMDA receptor, receptor internalization, lysosomal degradation, activity-dependent regulation, synaptic efficacy
MeSH terms
Nedd4 Ubiquitin Protein Ligases, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Cells, Cultured, Female, Humans, Male, Endopeptidases, Synapses, Protein Transport, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Mice, Rats, Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review