Cited by 69Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeural dynamics and brain function

GRIP1 is required for homeostatic regulation of AMPAR trafficking

Open access
Tan, Han L., Queenan, Bridget N., Huganir, Richard L.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Homeostatic plasticity constrains neuronal networks, allowing the brain to maintain a dynamic equilibrium. Loss of homeostatic plasticity disrupts normal brain function and has been implicated in autism spectrum disorder. Much of homeostatic regulation centers on synapses. In particular, excitatory AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) are moved in and out of synapses to recalibrate neuronal activity. AMPARs can be inserted at the surface to compensate for inactivity or removed to compensate for hyperactivity. We found that GRIP1, an AMPAR-binding protein implicated in autism, regulates the homeostatic shuttling of AMPARs between cytoplasmic and synaptic pools. Restoring GRIP1 regulation may therefore prove therapeutically useful in autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1512786112

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bicuculline-induced scaling-down in cultured neurons involves the downregulation of GluA1/2/3 protein levels as well as a reduced synaptic targeting of all AMPAR subunits.

    “Bicuculline-induced scaling-down in cultured neurons involves the downregulation of GluA1/2/3 protein levels as well a reduced synaptic targeting of all AMPAR subunits (Diering et al., 2014, Tan et al., 2015).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2015

    The ‘Inactivity-Induced Synaptic Scaling Is Blocked in GRIP Knockout’ section reports that bicuculline reduced total GluA1, GluA2, and GluA3 expression and reduced surface levels of all three in cultured neurons (Fig. S1; Fig. 3 A–D). It does not establish reduced synaptic targeting of each subunit specifically; the reported subunit-specific measurements are of surface levels. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TTX-induced homeostatic scaling-up in cultured neurons increases GluA1 protein expression as well as surface and synaptic levels of CP-AMPARs (GluA1 homomers) and GluA1/2 heteromers, but not GluA3-containing AMPARs.

    “TTX-induced homeostatic scaling-up in cultured neurons increases GluA1 protein expression as well as surface and synaptic levels of CP-AMPARs (GluA1 homomers) and GluA1/2 heteromers but not in GluA3-containing AMPARs (Figure 3) (Diering et al., 2014, Soares et al., 2013, Tan et al., 2015, Kim and Ziff, 2014, Hu et al., 2010).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2015

    The Results section reports that chronic TTX increased total GluA1 and surface GluA1 and GluA2, but not surface GluA3. The Discussion interprets the surface changes as preferential GluA1/GluA2 heteromer insertion. It does not establish increased surface or synaptic GluA1-homomer CP-AMPARs; instead, it says their synaptic insertion was unlikely to predominate (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During scaling-down, GRIP1 protein is upregulated but remains in intracellular compartments where it may act to sequester internalized GluA2-containing receptors away from the synapse.

    “Concomitantly, GRIP1 protein is upregulated during scaling-down, but remains in intracellular compartments where it may act to sequester internalized GluA2-containing receptors away from the synapse (Figure 3) (Tan et al., 2015).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2015

    The section on GRIP1 subcellular distribution (Fig. 4) reports that scaling down increases cytoplasmic GRIP1 and decreases synaptic GRIP1. It describes a cytoplasmic GRIP1 pool that can retain AMPARs intracellularly, but does not show that the increased pool sequesters internalized GluA2-containing receptors during scaling down; it instead reports reduced overall GRIP1–GluA2 interaction. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deletion of the GRIP1/2 genes completely blocks scaling-up.

    “Consistent with these data, deletion of the GRIP1/2 genes completely blocks scaling-up (Tan et al., 2015).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2015

  • Neither GRIP1/2 nor PICK1 are required for scaling-down.

    “Neither GRIP1/2 nor PICK1 are required for scaling-down (Tan et al., 2015, Anggono et al., 2011).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Turrigiano GG, Leslie KR, Desai NS, Rutherford LC, Nelson SB (1998) Activity- dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature 391(6670): 892-896.
  2. Fu AKY, et al. (2011) APC(Cdh1) mediates EphA4-dependent downregulation of AMPA receptors in homeostatic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 14(2):181-189.
  3. Hu JH, et al. (2010) Homeostatic scaling requires group I mGluR activation mediated by Homer1a. Neuron 68(6):1128-1142.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, H. L., Queenan, B. N., & Huganir, R. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-07-27
Volume
112
Issue
32
Pages
10026-10031
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1945016781
Cited by
69
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS036715)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
GRIP1, AMPA receptor trafficking, homeostatic plasticity, synaptic scaling, GluA2, PDZ domain, postsynaptic density, excitatory synapses
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Cell Membrane, Homeostasis, Models, Neurological, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Subcellular Fractions, Synapses, Tetrodotoxin, Receptors, AMPA, Mice, Knockout, Protein Transport, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review