Cited by 101Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Prefrontal Cortex Lesions Disrupt the Contextual Control of Response Conflict

Open access
Haddon, Josephine E., Killcross, Simon·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex has been implicated in multiple forms of goal-directed behavior. Rats with pretraining lesions to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) or specific lesions to the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) were trained and tested on a novel behavioral procedure measuring aspects of cue and response competition typical of tests of prefrontal function in humans. Rats were trained on two biconditional discrimination tasks, one auditory and one visual, in two discriminably different contexts. At test, they received presentations of audiovisual compounds of these training stimuli in both contexts, in extinction. These compounds were formed in such way that the individual elements had dictated either the same (congruent trials) or different (incongruent trials) responses during training. Sham-operated rats used the contextual cues to disambiguate the conflicting response information provided by incongruent stimulus compounds. ACC lesions impaired the contextual control of instrumental responding during incongruent cues during only the initial period of cue presentation, whereas larger PFC lesions abolished incongruent cue performance completely. Neither biconditional discrimination acquisition, nor test performance during congruent stimulus compounds, were affected by the lesions. These findings are consistent with human and nonhuman primate studies, indicating a role for the PFC in the processes by which cues come to control behavior in the face of conflicting information and the ACC specifically in processes such as detection of response conflict. This procedure provides a good foundation for an improved understanding of the disruption to goal-directed behavior seen with frontal dysfunction in a number of neuropsychological disorders including schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3243-05.2006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eight days of training is long enough for WT rats to successfully acquire the discrimination.

    “The animals in the current study were trained blind to genotype for eight days on the discrimination task—which we have previously shown to be long enough for WT rats to successfully acquire the discrimination [44, 49].”

    From Linking haploinsufficiency of the autism- and schizophrenia-associated gene Cyfip1 with striatal-limbic-cortical network dysfunction and cognitive inflexibility (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Biconditional discrimination training section says the rats trained for 14 days, and the Acquisition section reports that sham-operated controls successfully acquired the task by the end of training. Those passages support acquisition by control rats, but do not establish that eight days was long enough. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen JD, Braver TS, O'Reilly RC (1998) A computational approach to prefrontal cortex, cognitive control and schizophrenia: recent develop- ments and current challenges. In: The prefrontal cortex: executive and cognitive functions (Roberts AC, Robbins TW, Weiskrantz L, eds), pp 195-220. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  2. MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109:163-203.
  3. O'Reilly RC, Rudy JW (2001) Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 108:311-345.
  4. Rougier NP, Noelle D, Braver TS, Cohen JD, O'Reilly RC (2005) Prefrontal cortex and the flexibility of cognitive control: rules without symbols. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7338 -7343.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haddon, J. E., & Killcross, S.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Killcross, Simon
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-03-15
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
2933-2940
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1994044193
Cited by
101
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, response conflict, contextual control, biconditional discrimination, cue competition, response competition, goal-directed behavior, frontal lobe dysfunction, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Choice Behavior, Conditioning, Operant, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Goals, Gyrus Cinguli, Male, Neurotoxins, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reinforcement, Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review