Cited by 160Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

More Is Less: A Disinhibited Prefrontal Cortex Impairs Cognitive Flexibility

Open access
Gruber, Aaron J., Calhoon, Gwendolyn G., Shusterman, Igor, Schoenbaum, Geoffrey, Roesch, Matthew R., O'Donnell, Patricio·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is critical for decision making, and it becomes dysfunctional in many neuropsychiatric disorders. Studies in schizophrenia patients and relevant animal models suggest loss of PFC inhibitory interneuron function. For instance, rats with a neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion (NVHL) show a deficient modulation of PFC interneurons by dopamine (DA). Whether the PFC becomes disinhibited in this model and alters decision making remains to be determined. Here, we recorded neural activity in the medial PFC of NVHL rats during a reward-discounting choice task that activated DA systems. Rats were trained to sample odors that instructed them to select one of two feeders that delivered unequal amounts of liquid. Putative pyramidal neurons in the PFC were hyperactive whereas task-related field potential oscillations were significantly reduced in NVHL rats, consistent with impaired interneuron activation by DA during odor sampling leading to disorganized processing. Cognitive flexibility was tested by examining response bias and errors after reversing reward outcomes. NVHL rats demonstrated impaired flexibility as they were less able to track changes in reward outcome and made more response errors than controls did. Reducing cortical excitability with the metabotropic glutamate receptor 2/3 agonist LY379268 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) improved behavioral flexibility in NVHL rats but not controls. Furthermore, D2 dopamine receptors were involved, as the antagonist eticlopride (0.02 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced the ability to switch only in control animals. We conclude that NVHL rats present PFC disinhibition, which affects neural information processing and the selection of appropriate behavioral responses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4623-10.2010

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruber, A. J., Calhoon, G. G., Shusterman, I., Schoenbaum, G., Roesch, M. R., & O'Donnell, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
30
Issue
50
Pages
17102-17110
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1965655488
Cited by
160
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • National Institutes of Health (MH57683)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG027097)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH57683, R56MH057683, R01MH057683)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015718, K01DA021609)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T34GM008663)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cognitive flexibility, medial prefrontal cortex, cortical excitability, mGluR2/3, dopamine D2 receptor, response bias, behavioral flexibility, schizophrenia model
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amino Acids, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Neural Inhibition, Salicylamides, Schizophrenic Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Dopamine Antagonists, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review