Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Presynaptic Control of Striatal Glutamatergic Neurotransmission by Adenosine A1–A2AReceptor Heteromers

Open access
Ciruela, Francisco, Casadó, Vicent, Rodrigues, Ricardo J., Luján, Rafael, Burgueño, Javier, Canals, Meritxell, Borycz, Janusz, Rebola, Nelson, Goldberg, Steven R., Mallol, Josefa, Cortés, Antonio, Canela, Enric I., López-Giménez, Juan F., Milligan, Graeme, Lluis, Carme, Cunha, Rodrigo A., Ferré, Sergi, Franco, Rafael·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The functional role of heteromers of G-protein-coupled receptors is a matter of debate. In the present study, we demonstrate that heteromerization of adenosine A 1 receptors (A 1 Rs) and A 2A receptors (A 2A Rs) allows adenosine to exert a fine-tuning modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission. By means of coimmunoprecipitation, bioluminescence and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques, we showed the existence of A 1 R–A 2A R heteromers in the cell surface of cotransfected cells. Immunogold detection and coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that A 1 R and A 2A R are colocalized in the same striatal glutamatergic nerve terminals. Radioligand-binding experiments in cotransfected cells and rat striatum showed that a main biochemical characteristic of the A 1 R–A 2A R heteromer is the ability of A 2A R activation to reduce the affinity of the A 1 R for agonists. This provides a switch mechanism by which low and high concentrations of adenosine inhibit and stimulate, respectively, glutamate release. Furthermore, it is also shown that A 1 R–A 2A R heteromers constitute a unique target for caffeine and that chronic caffeine treatment leads to modifications in the function of the A 1 R–A 2A R heteromer that could underlie the strong tolerance to the psychomotor effects of caffeine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3574-05.2006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Ciruela, F., Casadó, V., Rodrigues, R. J., Luján, R., Burgueño, J., Canals, M., Borycz, J., Rebola, N., Goldberg, S. R., Mallol, J., Cortés, A., Canela, E. I., López-Giménez, J. F., Milligan, G., Lluis, C., Cunha, R. A., Ferré, S., & Franco, R.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-02-15
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
2080-2087
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2106307937
Cited by
590
References
5
FWCI
16.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presynaptic Control of Striatal Glutamatergic Neurotransmission by Adenosine A1–A2AReceptor Heteromers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3574-05.2006
The paper
Ciruela, F., Casadó, V., Rodrigues, R. J., Luján, R., Burgueño, J., Canals, M., Borycz, J., Rebola, N., Goldberg, S. R., Mallol, J., Cortés, A., Canela, E. I., López-Giménez, J. F., Milligan, G., Lluis, C., Cunha, R. A., Ferré, S., & Franco, R. (2006). Presynaptic Control of Striatal Glutamatergic Neurotransmission by Adenosine A1–A2AReceptor Heteromers. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3574-05.2006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.