The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persistence of Parahippocampal Representation in the Absence of Stimulus Input Enhances Long-Term Encoding: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Subsequent Memory after a Delayed Match-to-Sample Task
Open accessAbstract
Recent theoretical models based on cellular processes in parahippocampal structures show that persistent neuronal spiking in the absence of stimulus input is important for encoding. The goal of this study was to examine in humans how sustained activity in the parahippocampal gyrus may underlie long-term encoding as well as active maintenance of novel information. The relationship between long-term encoding and active maintenance of novel information during brief memory delays was studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans performing a delayed matching-to-sample (DMS) task and a post-scan subsequent recognition memory task of items encountered during DMS task performance. Multiple regression analyses revealed fMRI activity in parahippocampal structures associated with the active maintenance of trial-unique visual information during a brief memory delay. In addition to a role in active maintenance, we found that the subsequent memory for the sample stimuli as measured by the post-scan subsequent recognition memory task correlated with activity in the parahippocampal gyrus during the delay period. The results provide direct evidence that encoding mechanisms are engaged during brief memory delays when novel information is actively maintained. The relationship between active maintenance during the delay period and long-term subsequent memory is consistent with current theoretical models and experimental data that suggest that long-term encoding is enhanced by sustained parahippocampal activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“fMRI activity in the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex during the delay period correlates with subsequent memory for the sample stimulus in a post-scan recognition memory task (Schon et al, 2004).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Schon et al, 2004
In the citing paper
“The persistent spiking mechanisms described above are consistent with fMRI studies using a delayed match to sample task (Schon et al, 2004).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Schon et al, 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · cited 2×
“This is consistent with human memory studies suggesting the necessity of a buffer for holding information during encoding (Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968; O’Reilly et al., 1999; Baddeley, 2000; Baddeley and Wilson, 2002).”
ResultHuman Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R., & Burdette, J. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00169-1 · Cited by 5,066
Bi, G.-Q., & Poo, M.-M. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-24-10464.1998 · Cited by 4,744
Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs
Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., & Sakmann, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5297.213 · Cited by 3,832
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1
Boynton, G., Engel, S., Glover, G., & Heeger, D. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04207.1996 · Cited by 2,522
Mazziotta, J. C., Toga, A. W., Evans, A. C., Fox, P. T., Lancaster, J. L., Zilles, K., Woods, R. P., Paus, T., Simpson, G. V., Pike, G. B., et al. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0915 · Cited by 2,417
Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999) · Cited by 2,404
Building Memories: Remembering and Forgetting of Verbal Experiences as Predicted by Brain Activity
Wagner, A. D., Schacter, D. L., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A. M., Rosen, B. R., & Buckner, R. L. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5380.1188 · Cited by 1,644
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 1998, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 19, 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of phase synchronization in memory processes
Fell, J., & Axmacher, N. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2979 · Cited by 1,620
Daselaar, S. M. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.013.2009 · Cited by 1,501
Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans
Davachi, L. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.012 · Cited by 1,138
A pathophysiological framework of hippocampal dysfunction in ageing and disease
Small, S. A., Schobel, S., Buxton, R. B., Witter, M. P., & Barnes, C. A. (2011) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3085 · Cited by 955
Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition
Hasselmo, M. E., & Sarter, M. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.104 · Cited by 733
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schon, K., Hasselmo, M. E., LoPresti, M. L., Tricarico, M. D., & Stern, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stern, Chantal E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-12-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 11088-11097
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6730271
- OpenAlex
- W2005890257
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 61492, R01MH061492)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS41636, R01NS041636)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- parahippocampal gyrus, long-term memory encoding, subsequent memory, delayed matching-to-sample, memory delay, recognition memory, hippocampal function
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cues, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Photic Stimulation, Regression Analysis, Retention, Psychology, Task Performance and Analysis, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors, Parahippocampal Gyrus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
