The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Reactive Astrocyte-Derived Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Isolated from the Cortical Peri-Infarct Area after Stroke
Open accessAbstract
In response to stroke, subpopulations of cortical reactive astrocytes proliferate and express proteins commonly associated with neural stem/progenitor cells such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Nestin. To examine the stem cell-related properties of cortical reactive astrocytes after injury, we generated GFAP-CreER(TM);tdRFP mice to permanently label reactive astrocytes. We isolated cells from the cortical peri-infarct area 3 d after stroke, and cultured them in neural stem cell medium containing epidermal growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor. We observed tdRFP-positive neural spheres in culture, suggestive of tdRFP-positive reactive astrocyte-derived neural stem/progenitor cells (Rad-NSCs). Cultured Rad-NSCs self-renewed and differentiated into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Pharmacological inhibition and conditional knock-out mouse studies showed that Presenilin 1 and Notch 1 controlled neural sphere formation by Rad-NSCs after stroke. To examine the self-renewal and differentiation potential of Rad-NSCs in vivo, Rad-NSCs were transplanted into embryonic, neonatal, and adult mouse brains. Transplanted Rad-NSCs were observed to persist in the subventricular zone and secondary Rad-NSCs were isolated from the host brain 28 d after transplantation. In contrast with neurogenic postnatal day 4 NSCs and adult NSCs from the subventricular zone, transplanted Rad-NSCs differentiated into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, but not neurons, demonstrating that Rad-NSCs had restricted differentiation in vivo. Our results indicate that Rad-NSCs are unlikely to be suitable for neuronal replacement in the absence of genetic or epigenetic modification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Astrocytes: Biology and pathology
Sofroniew, M. V., & Vinters, H. V. (2010) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8 · Cited by 5,196
Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation
Sofroniew, M. V. (2009) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.08.002 · Cited by 2,594
New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain.
Nedergaard, M., Ransom, B., & Goldman, S. A. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.008 · Cited by 1,334 · cited 5×
“In addition, whether reactive astrocyte-derived NSCs are multipotent following transplantation back to the CNS is not known.”
BackgroundInfluentialZawadzka, M., Rivers, L. E., Fancy, S. P. J., Zhao, C., Tripathi, R., Jamen, F., Young, K., Goncharevich, A., Pohl, H., Rizzi, M., et al. (2010) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.002 · Cited by 650
Origin of New Glial Cells in Intact and Injured Adult Spinal Cord
Barnabé-Heider, F., Göritz, C., Sabelström, H., Takebayashi, H., Pfrieger, F. W., Meletis, K., & Frisén, J. (2010) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.014 · Cited by 628
Dimou, L., Simon, C., Kirchhoff, F., Takebayashi, H., & Götz, M. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2831-08.2008 · Cited by 551
Astrocyte intermediate filaments in CNS pathologies and regeneration
Pekny, M., & Pekna, M. (2004) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1645 · Cited by 420 · cited 1×
“Subpopulations of reactive astrocytes differentially express several stem cell-associated proteins such as Sox2, GFAP, Nestin, and RC2 (Pekny and Pekna, 2004; Buffo et al., 2008; Shimada et al., 2010; Zawadzka et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMori, T., Tanaka, K., Buffo, A., Wurst, W., Kühn, R., & Götz, M. (2006) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.20350 · Cited by 398
Cited by
Astrocyte barriers to neurotoxic inflammation
Sofroniew, M. V. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3898 · Cited by 1,202
Wanner, I. B., Anderson, M. A., Song, B., Levine, J., Fernandez, A., Gray-Thompson, Z., Ao, Y., & Sofroniew, M. V. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2121-13.2013 · Cited by 839
Guo, Z., Zhang, L., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, F., & Chen, G. (2014) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.001 · Cited by 832
A latent neurogenic program in astrocytes regulated by Notch signaling in the mouse
Magnusson, J. P., Göritz, C., Tatarishvili, J., Dias, D. O., Smith, E. M. K., Lindvall, O., Kokaia, Z., & Frisén, J. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.346.6206.237 · Cited by 431
Cellular senescence and the senescent secretory phenotype in age-related chronic diseases
Zhu, Y., Armstrong, J. L., Tchkonia, T., & Kirkland, J. L. (2014) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000065 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimada, I. S., LeComte, M. D., Granger, J. C., Quinlan, N. J., & Spees, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-06-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7926-7940
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1966345556
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Reactive Astrocyte-Derived Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Isolated from the Cortical Peri-Infarct Area after Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4303-11.2012
- The paper
- Shimada, I. S., LeComte, M. D., Granger, J. C., Quinlan, N. J., & Spees, J. L. (2012). Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Reactive Astrocyte-Derived Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Isolated from the Cortical Peri-Infarct Area after Stroke. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4303-11.2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.