The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds
Open accessAbstract
How do cortical neurons represent the acoustic environment? This question is often addressed by probing with simple stimuli such as clicks or tone pips. Such stimuli have the advantage of yielding easily interpreted answers, but have the disadvantage that they may fail to uncover complex or higher-order neuronal response properties. Here, we adopt an alternative approach, probing neuronal responses with complex acoustic stimuli, including animal vocalizations. We used in vivo whole-cell methods in the rat auditory cortex to record subthreshold membrane potential fluctuations elicited by these stimuli. Most neurons responded robustly and reliably to the complex stimuli in our ensemble. Using regularization techniques, we estimated the linear component, the spectrotemporal receptive field (STRF), of the transformation from the sound (as represented by its time-varying spectrogram) to the membrane potential of the neuron. We find that the STRF has a rich dynamical structure, including excitatory regions positioned in general accord with the prediction of the classical tuning curve. However, whereas the STRF successfully predicts the responses to some of the natural stimuli, it surprisingly fails completely to predict the responses to others; on average, only 11% of the response power could be predicted by the STRF. Therefore, most of the response of the neuron cannot be predicted by the linear component, although the response is deterministically related to the stimulus. Analysis of the systematic errors of the STRF model shows that this failure cannot be attributed to simple nonlinearities such as adaptation to mean intensity, rectification, or saturation. Rather, the highly nonlinear response properties of auditory cortical neurons must be attributable to nonlinear interactions between sound frequencies and time-varying properties of the neural encoder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Cited by
Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system
Mante, V., Frazor, R. A., Bonin, V., Geisler, W. S., & Carandini, M. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1556 · Cited by 373
Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex
Nelken, I. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.005 · Cited by 223
Laminar processing in the visual cortical column.
Hirsch, J. A., & Martinez, L. M. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.014 · Cited by 120
Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech
Young, E. D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2151 · Cited by 104
Inferring input nonlinearities in neural encoding models
Ahrens, M. B., Paninski, L., & Sahani, M. (2008) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/09548980701813936 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Machens, C. K., Wehr, M. S., & Zador, A. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-02-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1089-1100
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2131562784
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4445-03.2004
- The paper
- Machens, C. K., Wehr, M. S., & Zador, A. M. (2004). Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4445-03.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.