The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remodeling of Synaptic Structure in Sensory Cortical Areas In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
Although plastic changes are known to occur in developing and adult cortex, it remains unclear whether these changes require remodeling of cortical circuitry whereby synapses are formed and eliminated or whether they rely on changes in the strength of existing synapses. To determine the structural stability of dendritic spines and axon terminals in vivo, we chose two approaches. First, we performed time-lapse two-photon imaging of dendritic spine motility of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in juvenile [postnatal day 28 (P28)] mice in visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices. We found that there were differences in basal rates of dendritic spine motility of the same neuron type in different cortices, with visual cortex exhibiting the least structural dynamics. Rewiring visual input into the auditory cortex at birth, however, failed to alter dendritic spine motility, suggesting that structural plasticity rates might be intrinsic to the cortical region. Second, we investigated the persistence of both the presynaptic (axon terminals) and postsynaptic (dendritic spine) structures in young adult mice (P40–P61), using chronic in vivo two-photon imaging in different sensory areas. Both terminals and spines were relatively stable, with >80% persisting over a 3 week period in all sensory regions. Axon terminals were more stable than dendritic spines. These data suggest that changes in network function during adult learning and memory might occur through changes in the strength and efficacy of existing synapses as well as some remodeling of connectivity through the loss and gain of synapses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines
Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02617 · Cited by 2,483
Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex
Trachtenberg, J. T., Chen, B. E., Knott, G. W., Feng, G., Sanes, J. R., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01273 · Cited by 1,927
Matsuzaki, M., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Nemoto, T., Miyashita, Y., Iino, M., & Kasai, H. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn736 · Cited by 1,563 · cited 2×
“This supports the view that thin spines carry weak synapses (Matsuzaki et al., 2001) and, when potentiated, grow to become mushroom spines (Matsuzaki et al.”
BackgroundLong-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex
Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N., & Gan, W.-B. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01276 · Cited by 1,198
Shrinkage of dendritic spines associated with long-term depression of hippocampal synapses
Zhou, Q., Homma, K. J., & Poo, M.-M. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.011 · Cited by 1,025
Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines
Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Knutti, D., & Matus, A. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80467-5 · Cited by 905
Okamoto, K.-I., Nagai, T., Miyawaki, A., & Hayashi, Y. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1311 · Cited by 854
Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo
Lendvai, B., Stern, E. A., Chen, B., & Svoboda, K. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35009107 · Cited by 802
Glutamate receptors regulate actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines
Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Wagner, U., Brinkhaus, H., & Matus, A. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/78791 · Cited by 446
Developmental regulation of spine motility in the mammalian central nervous system
Dunaevsky, A., Tashiro, A., Majewska, A., Mason, C., & Yuste, R. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.23.13438 · Cited by 412
Self-citation
Cited by
Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain
Holtmaat, A., & Svoboda, K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2699 · Cited by 1,934
Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology
Ntziachristos, V. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1483 · Cited by 1,896
Microglial interactions with synapses are modulated by visual experience
Tremblay, M.-È., Lowery, R. L., & Majewska, A. K. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000527 · Cited by 1,542
Self-citationDo thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember?
Bourne, J., & Harris, K. M. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.009 · Cited by 843
Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex
Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Knott, G. W., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04783 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Majewska, A. K., Newton, J. R., & Sur, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-03-15
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3021-3029
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1976958941
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remodeling of Synaptic Structure in Sensory Cortical Areas In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4454-05.2006
- The paper
- Majewska, A. K., Newton, J. R., & Sur, M. (2006). Remodeling of Synaptic Structure in Sensory Cortical Areas In Vivo. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4454-05.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.