Cited by 843Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember?

Bourne, Jennifer, Harris, Kristen M·2007·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the primary site of excitatory input on most principal neurons. Long-lasting changes in synaptic activity are accompanied by alterations in spine shape, size and number. The responsiveness of thin spines to increases and decreases in synaptic activity has led to the suggestion that they are 'learning spines', whereas the stability of mushroom spines suggests that they are 'memory spines'. Synaptic enhancement leads to an enlargement of thin spines into mushroom spines and the mobilization of subcellular resources to potentiated synapses. Thin spines also concentrate biochemical signals such as Ca(2+), providing the synaptic specificity required for learning. Determining the mechanisms that regulate spine morphology is essential for understanding the cellular changes that underlie learning and memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.009

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourne, J., & Harris, K. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Kristen M
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
381-386
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111155182
Cited by
843
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 38
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS033574, NS21184, NS33574)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB002170, R01EB002170)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
dendritic spines, mushroom spines, dendritic spine morphology, synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, calcium signaling, synaptic specificity, excitatory synapses
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Computer Simulation, Memory, Models, Molecular, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Dendritic Spines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review