Cited by 854Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Rapid and persistent modulation of actin dynamics regulates postsynaptic reorganization underlying bidirectional plasticity

Okamoto, Ken-Ichi, Nagai, Takeharu, Miyawaki, Atsushi, Hayashi, Yasunori·2004·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The synapse is a highly organized cellular specialization whose structure and composition are reorganized, both positively and negatively, depending on the strength of input signals. The mechanisms orchestrating these changes are not well understood. A plausible locus for the reorganization of synapse components and structure is actin, because it serves as both cytoskeleton and scaffold for synapses and exists in a dynamic equilibrium between F-actin and G-actin that is modulated bidirectionally by cellular signaling. Using a new FRET-based imaging technique to monitor F-actin/G-actin equilibrium, we show here that tetanic stimulation causes a rapid, persistent shift of actin equilibrium toward F-actin in the dendritic spines of rat hippocampal neurons. This enlarges the spines and increases postsynaptic binding capacity. In contrast, prolonged low-frequency stimulation shifts the equilibrium toward G-actin, resulting in a loss of postsynaptic actin and of structure. This bidirectional regulation of actin is actively involved in protein assembly and disassembly and provides a substrate for bidirectional synaptic plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1311

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many synaptic proteins are remarkably dynamic, including AMPARs, NMDARs, CaMKII, and scaffolding proteins such as PSD-95.

    “These studies show that many synaptic proteins are remarkably dynamic, including AMPARs (237, 249, 327, 328), NMDARs (329), CaMKII (330), and scaffolding proteins, such as PSD-95 (331).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [330]

  • Spine enlargement associated with LTP can be immediately induced by intensive stimulation of postsynaptic NMDA-sensitive glutamate receptors (the conventional protocol) in CA1 pyramidal neurons.

    “The spine enlargement associated with LTP can be immediately induced by intensive stimulation of postsynaptic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)–sensitive glutamate receptors (the conventional protocol) in CA1 pyramidal neurons (3–5).”
  • LTD is associated with the shrinkage and elimination of spines.

    “whereas LTD is associated with the shrinkage and elimination of spines (Okamoto et al., 2004)”
  • Rho GTPases play important roles in regulating the actin cytoskeleton, which is essential for spine-specific, long-term structural and functional plasticity.

    “Rho GTPases may constitute such signalling, because they play important roles in regulating actin cytoskeleton3,16, which is essential for spine-specific, long-term structural and functional plasticity14,17.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okamoto, K.-I., Nagai, T., Miyawaki, A., & Hayashi, Y.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hayashi, Yasunori
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2004-09-07
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1104-1112
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2093807579
Cited by
854
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 42
FWCI
14.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
actin dynamics, dendritic spines, bidirectional synaptic plasticity, tetanic stimulation, low-frequency stimulation, hippocampal neurons, FRET imaging, synaptic structure, cytoskeleton
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Brain, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Actin Cytoskeleton, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Organ Culture Techniques, Protein Binding, Synaptic Membranes, Time Factors, Up-Regulation, Nonlinear Dynamics, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases, Image Cytometry, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, NIH 3T3 Cells, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Rats, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review