Cited by 107Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Cognitive Aging and the Hippocampus: How Old Rats Represent New Environments

Open access
Wilson, Iain A., Ikonen, Sami, Gureviciene, Irina, McMahan, Robert W., Gallagher, Michela, Eichenbaum, Howard, Tanila, Heikki·2004·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Spatial learning impairment in aged rats is associated with changes in hippocampal connectivity and plasticity. Several studies have explored the age-related deficit in spatial information processing by recording the location-specific activity of hippocampal neurons (place cells). However, these studies have generated disparate characterizations of place cells in aged rats as unstable (Barnes et al., 1997), resistant to change (Tanila et al., 1997b; Oler and Markus, 2000; Wilson et al., 2003), or delayed in using external cues (Rosenzweig et al., 2003). To reconcile these findings, we recorded place cells from aged and young rats as they repeatedly explored both a highly familiar environment and an initially novel environment, and we repeatedly tested whether the place fields formed in the novel environment were anchored by external cues. Initially, spatial representations in aged rats were abnormally maintained between the familiar and novel environments. Then, new representations were formed but were also delayed in becoming anchored to the external landmarks. Finally, even when the new spatial representations became bound to the landmarks, they were multi-stable across repetitive exposures to the formerly novel environment. These observations help to reconcile previously divergent characterizations of spatial representation in aged rats and suggest a model of cognitive aging and hippocampal function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5205-03.2004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some aged rodents that do not develop AD pathology nevertheless have memory deficits, such as a failure to encode novel information while navigating similar situations.

    “Some aged rodents that do not develop AD pathology nevertheless have memory deficits, such as a failure to encode novel information while navigating similar situations [69].”

    From Arf4 Determines Dentate Gyrus-Mediated Pattern Separation by Regulating Dendritic Spine Development (2012) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Experiment 1 Spatial learning section reports impaired spatial memory in some aged rats, and Representation of a novel environment reports that some initially retained a familiar spatial representation in a novel arena. But the arenas differed in shape and salient cues rather than being similar, the deficit was initially delayed encoding rather than a lasting failure, and the paper does not establish that the rats lacked AD pathology. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Redish AD, Touretzky DS (1999) Separating hippocampal maps. In: The hippocampal and parietal foundation of spatial cognition (Burgess N, Jeffery KJ, O'Keefe J, eds), pp 203-219. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  2. Skaggs WE, McNaughton BL, Gothard KM, Markus EJ (1993) An informa- tion theoretic approach to deciphering the hippocampal code. In: Ad- vances in neural information processing systems (Hanson SJ, Cowan JD, Giles CL, eds), pp 1030 -1037. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, I. A., Ikonen, S., Gureviciene, I., McMahan, R. W., Gallagher, M., Eichenbaum, H., & Tanila, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2004-04-14
Volume
24
Issue
15
Pages
3870-3878
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1990841646
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG09973, P01AG009973)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
cognitive aging, hippocampus, place cells, spatial learning, spatial representation, aged rats, novel environment, hippocampal plasticity, hippocampal connectivity
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Cognition, Cues, Environment, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Pyramidal Cells, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review