The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Progression of Structural and Functional Alterations in Distinct Retinal Ganglion Cell Types in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma
Open accessAbstract
Intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation is a principal risk factor for glaucoma. Using a microbead injection technique to chronically raise IOP for 15 or 30 d in mice, we identified the early changes in visual response properties of different types of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and correlated these changes with neuronal morphology before cell death. Microbead-injected eyes showed reduced optokinetic tracking as well as cell death. In such eyes, multielectrode array recordings revealed that four RGC types show diverse alterations in their light responses upon IOP elevation. OFF-transient RGCs exhibited a more rapid decline in both structural and functional organizations compared with other RGCs. In contrast, although the light-evoked responses of OFF-sustained RGCs were perturbed, the dendritic arbor of this cell type remained intact. ON-transient and ON-sustained RGCs had normal functional receptive field sizes but their spontaneous and light-evoked firing rates were reduced. ON- and OFF-sustained RGCs lost excitatory synapses across an otherwise structurally normal dendritic arbor. Together, our observations indicate that there are changes in spontaneous activity and light-evoked responses in RGCs before detectable dendritic loss. However, when dendrites retract, we found corresponding changes in receptive field center size. Importantly, the effects of IOP elevation are not uniformly manifested in the structure and function of diverse RGC populations, nor are distinct RGC types perturbed within the same time-frame by such a challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010
Pascolini, D., & Mariotti, S. P. (2012) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539 · Cited by 3,763
Heijl, A. (2002) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268 · Cited by 3,320
Imaging Neuronal Subsets in Transgenic Mice Expressing Multiple Spectral Variants of GFP
Feng, G., Mellor, R. H., Bernstein, M., Keller-Peck, C., Nguyen, Q. T., Wallace, M., Nerbonne, J. M., Lichtman, J. W., & Sanes, J. R. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00084-2 · Cited by 3,042
Synapse Loss and Microglial Activation Precede Tangles in a P301S Tauopathy Mouse Model
Yoshiyama, Y., Higuchi, M., Zhang, B., Huang, S.-M., Iwata, N., Saido, T. C., Maeda, J., Suhara, T., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Lee, V. M.-Y. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.010 · Cited by 2,208
The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E., & Masland, R. H. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-08936.1998 · Cited by 1,429
Parallel processing in the mammalian retina
Wässle, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1497 · Cited by 1,252
The fundamental plan of the retina
Masland, R. H. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0901-877 · Cited by 1,237
Lacor, P. N., Buniel, M. C., Furlow, P. W., Sanz Clemente, A., Velasco, P. T., Wood, M., Viola, K. L., & Klein, W. L. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3501-06.2007 · Cited by 1,188
Longair, M. H., Baker, D. A., & Armstrong, J. D. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr390 · Cited by 970
Cited by
The Types of Retinal Ganglion Cells: Current Status and Implications for Neuronal Classification
Sanes, J. R., & Masland, R. H. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-034120 · Cited by 789
Tran, N. M., Shekhar, K., Whitney, I. E., Jacobi, A., Benhar, I., Hong, G., Yan, W., Adiconis, X., Arnold, M. E., Lee, J. M., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.006 · Cited by 627
Functional architecture of the retina: Development and disease
Hoon, M., Okawa, H., Della Santina, L., & Wong, R. O. L. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.06.003 · Cited by 585
Self-citationNeuronal Cell Types and Connectivity: Lessons from the Retina
Seung, H. S., & Sümbül, U. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.054 · Cited by 143
Optic nerve astrocyte reactivity protects function in experimental glaucoma and other nerve injuries
Sun, D., Moore, S., & Jakobs, T. C. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20160412 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Della Santina, L., Inman, D. M., Lupien, C. B., Horner, P. J., & Wong, R. O. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-10-30
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 17444-17457
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1981710696
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Progression of Structural and Functional Alterations in Distinct Retinal Ganglion Cell Types in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.5461-12.2013
- The paper
- Della Santina, L., Inman, D. M., Lupien, C. B., Horner, P. J., & Wong, R. O. L. (2013). Differential Progression of Structural and Functional Alterations in Distinct Retinal Ganglion Cell Types in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5461-12.2013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
