The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Looming Signals Reveal Synergistic Principles of Multisensory Integration
Open accessAbstract
Multisensory interactions are a fundamental feature of brain organization. Principles governing multisensory processing have been established by varying stimulus location, timing and efficacy independently. Determining whether and how such principles operate when stimuli vary dynamically in their perceived distance (as when looming/receding) provides an assay for synergy among the above principles and also means for linking multisensory interactions between rudimentary stimuli with higher-order signals used for communication and motor planning. Human participants indicated movement of looming or receding versus static stimuli that were visual, auditory, or multisensory combinations while 160-channel EEG was recorded. Multivariate EEG analyses and distributed source estimations were performed. Nonlinear interactions between looming signals were observed at early poststimulus latencies (∼75 ms) in analyses of voltage waveforms, global field power, and source estimations. These looming-specific interactions positively correlated with reaction time facilitation, providing direct links between neural and performance metrics of multisensory integration. Statistical analyses of source estimations identified looming-specific interactions within the right claustrum/insula extending inferiorly into the amygdala and also within the bilateral cuneus extending into the inferior and lateral occipital cortices. Multisensory effects common to all conditions, regardless of perceived distance and congruity, followed (∼115 ms) and manifested as faster transition between temporally stable brain networks (vs summed responses to unisensory conditions). We demonstrate the early-latency, synergistic interplay between existing principles of multisensory interactions. Such findings change the manner in which to model multisensory interactions at neural and behavioral/perceptual levels. We also provide neurophysiologic backing for the notion that looming signals receive preferential treatment during perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The insula is a well-known center for multisensory integration, and activation of the AIC has been associated with the timing and synchrony of convergent sensory stimuli (Bushara et al. 2001, 2003; Calvert et al. 2001; Cappe et al. 2012).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Cappe et al. 2012
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4365 · Cited by 1,897
Michel, C., Murray, M. M., Lantz, G., Gonzalez, S., Spinelli, L., & de Peralta, R. G. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,771
Self-citationEntrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron
Stein, B. E., & Stanford, T. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2331 · Cited by 1,598
Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields
Lehmann, D., & Skrandies, W. (1980) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80)90419-8 · Cited by 1,595
Is neocortex essentially multisensory?
GHAZANFAR, A., & SCHROEDER, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008 · Cited by 1,463
Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review
Murray, M. M., Brunet, D., & Michel, C. M. (2008) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5 · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationGiard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563544 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal interaction: A review
Turk, M. (2013) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2013.07.003 · Cited by 554
Baum, S. H., Stevenson, R. A., & Wallace, M. T. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.007 · Cited by 370
Kolarik, A. J., Moore, B. C. J., Zahorik, P., Cirstea, S., & Pardhan, S. (2015) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-015-1015-1 · Cited by 301
Multisensory Integration: Flexible Use of General Operations
van Atteveldt, N., Murray, M. M., Thut, G., & Schroeder, C. E. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.044 · Cited by 288
Self-citationDynamic sounds capture the boundaries of peripersonal space representation in humans
Canzoneri, E., Magosso, E., & Serino, A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044306 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Cappe, C., Thelen, A., Romei, V., Thut, G., & Murray, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-01-25
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1171-1182
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6796264
- OpenAlex
- W2096817458
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 19.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (118419)
- Fondation Leenaards
- Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- multisensory integration, looming stimuli, perceived distance, stimulus timing, stimulus location, reaction time facilitation, claustrum, insula, amygdala, cuneus, occipital cortex, neural network dynamics, EEG source localization, global field power
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
