Cited by 41Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Non-Hebbian Synaptic Plasticity Induced by Repetitive Postsynaptic Action Potentials

Open access
Kato, Hiroyuki K., Watabe, Ayako M., Manabe, Toshiya·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Modern theories on memory storage have mainly focused on Hebbian long-term potentiation (LTP), which requires coincident activation of presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons for its induction. In addition to Hebbian LTP, the roles of non-Hebbian plasticity have also been predicted by some neuronal network models. However, still only a few pieces of evidence have been presented for the presence of such plasticity. In this study, we show in mouse hippocampal slices that LTP can be induced by postsynaptic repetitive depolarization alone in the absence of presynaptic inputs. The induction was dependent on voltage-dependent calcium channels instead of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), whereas the expression mechanism was shared with conventional NMDAR-dependent LTP. During the potentiation, the amplitude of spontaneous EPSCs was increased, suggesting a novel neuron-wide nature of this form of LTP. Furthermore, we also successfully induced LTP with trains of action potentials, which supported the possible existence of depolarizing pulse-induced LTP in vivo. Based on these findings, we suggest a model in which neuron-wide LTP works in concert with synapse-specific Hebbian plasticity to help information processing in memory formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5881-08.2009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voltage pulse potentiation (VPP) typically is transient, lasting no longer than 20 min.

    “the potentiation typically is transient, lasting no longer than 20 min (Refs. 189–193, but see Refs. 194, 195).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [194]

    In 'Induction of non-Hebbian LTP by postsynaptic depolarization' (page unavailable), the paper contrasts an earlier transient result with its own stable potentiation, observed for nearly an hour without a tendency to decay. The cited paper therefore provides an exception to the stated 20-minute limit, consistent with the citing sentence’s 'but see' qualification, rather than evidence for that limit. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological the- ory. New York: Wiley Interscience.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kato, H. K., Watabe, A. M., & Manabe, T.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Manabe, Toshiya
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-09-09
Volume
29
Issue
36
Pages
11153-11160
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2056202524
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Novartis Foundation
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation
  • Ichiro Kanehara Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Sciences and Medical Care
  • NOVARTIS Foundation (Japan) for the Promotion of Science
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
long-term potentiation, voltage-gated calcium channels, NMDA receptor, spontaneous EPSCs, hippocampus, memory formation, Hebbian plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Guinea Pigs, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuronal Plasticity, Organ Culture Techniques, Synapses, Long-Term Potentiation, Mice, Synaptic Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review