The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy
Abstract
The problem of informant accuracy is examined in light of principles of memory organization from cognitive psychology. These principles turn out to be powerful, not only in explaining overall patterns of informant error, but in predicting details about the types of errors made. Predictions are made in terms both of different kinds of informants and different kinds of objects. All the predictions are strongly supported by the data. Finally, in the light of these results, two strategies are developed. The “best” informants, it seems, can be used to reveal long‐range stable patterns of events, and the “worst” informants can be used to reveal the details of a particular event of special interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
Tulving, E. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043150 · Cited by 867
Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970.
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1971) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0030806 · Cited by 635
Cited by
DiMaggio, P. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 · Cited by 3,161
Social Isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100301 · Cited by 1,887
Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data
Eagle, N., Pentland, A. (., & Lazer, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900282106 · Cited by 1,856
Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256771 · Cited by 689
Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0129 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., & Freeman, S. C.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 310-325
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W2055444504
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
