Cited by 689Management and Organizational StudiesCorporate Identity and ReputationSocial Power and Status Dynamics

BRINGING THE INDIVIDUAL BACK IN: A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNAL MARKET FOR REPUTATION IN ORGANIZATIONS.

Kilduff, M., Krackhardt, D.·1994·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

We challenge the claimed incommensurability of individualism and structuralism by showing how a cognitive theory can guide the use of structural methods. According to balance theory, there is a str...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256771

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1994-02-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
87-108
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2010649708
Cited by
689
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 47
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
individualism, structuralism, balance theory, cognitive theory, structural analysis, individual behavior in organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review