The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
making kin: kinship theory and Zumbagua adoptions
Abstract
The biological definition of family at the root of functionalist kinship theory has been rightly criticized by contemporary feminist and symbolic anthropologists, but in retreating into an antinatural position such critiques simply recapitulate the limitations of an opposition between nature and culture in which the former is prior and essential, the latter secondary and historical. From the perspective of Zumbagua, where people become parents by feeding and caring for children over extended periods of time, both schools of thought are not only inadequate to explain fully the material bases of local practice but are representative of a specific Western‐bourgeois ideology that indigenous people actively oppose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1991.33 · Cited by 29,379
Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object
Fabian, J. (1983) · Cited by 6,759
Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences
Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1987) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386453 · Cited by 3,658
Clifford, J. (1986) · Writing Culture · doi:10.1525/9780520946286-003 · Cited by 2,144
The Elementary Structures of Kinship.
Moore, S. F., Levi-Strauss, C., Bell, J. H., von Strumer, J. R., & Needham, R. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093974 · Cited by 2,110
The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction
Hoffert, S. D., & Martin, E. (1988) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1889681 · Cited by 2,051
Families we choose: lesbians, gays, kinship
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1816 · Cited by 1,768
American Kinship: A Cultural Account.
Bloch, M., & Schneider, D. M. (1972) · Man · doi:10.2307/2799972 · Cited by 1,498
A Critique of the Study of Kinship
Schneider, D. (1984) · doi:10.3998/mpub.7203 · Cited by 1,350
In theory: classes, nations, literatures
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-3098 · Cited by 1,207
Cited by
How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement
KOHN, E. (2007) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.3 · Cited by 722
Mobility, Moralities and Motherhood: Navigating the Contingencies of Cape Verdean Lives
Åkesson, L., Carling, J., & Drotbohm, H. (2012) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2012.646420 · Cited by 125
Leinaweaver (2010) · doi:10.1177/0094582x10380222 · Cited by 89
Doyon, L. G. (2002) · Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association · doi:10.1525/ap3a.2002.11.1.79 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- WEISMANTEL, M.
- Venue
- American Ethnologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 685-704
- ISSN
- 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2018819681
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: making kin: kinship theory and Zumbagua adoptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/ae.1995.22.4.02a00010
- The paper
- WEISMANTEL, M. (1995). making kin: kinship theory and Zumbagua adoptions. American Ethnologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.4.02a00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.