Cited by 554Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBioenergy crop production and managementBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses

Hertel, Thomas W., Golub, Alla A., Jones, Andrew D., O'Hare, Michael, Plevin, Richard J., Kammen, Daniel M.·2010·BioScience

DOI 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.8

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Releases of greenhouse gases (GHG) from indirect land-use change triggered by crop-based biofuels have taken center stage in the debate over the role of biofuels in climate policy and energy security. This article analyzes these releases for maize ethanol produced in the United States. Factoring market-mediated responses and by-product use into our analysis reduces cropland conversion by 72% from the land used for the ethanol feedstock. Consequently, the associated GHG release estimated in our framework is 800 grams of carbon dioxide per megajoule (MJ); 27 grams per MJ per year, over 30 years of ethanol production, or roughly a quarter of the only other published estimate of releases attributable to changes in indirect land use. Nonetheless, 800 grams are enough to cancel out the benefits that corn ethanol has on global warming, thereby limiting its potential contribution in the context of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888 · cited 5×
“…estimate of emissions due to ILUC from the production of maize ethanol is about 3000 grams (g) of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent discharge per annual megajoule (MJ) of maize ethanol production capacity (Searchinger et al. 2008), or 100 g per MJ if allocated over 30 years of production.”
Influential
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
Farrell, A. E., Plevin, R. J., Turner, B. T., Jones, A. D., O'Hare, M., & Kammen, D. M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121416 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citation
Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error
Searchinger, T. D., Hamburg, S. P., Melillo, J. M., Chameides, W. L., Havlík, P., Kammen, D. M., Likens, G. E., Lubowski, R. N., Obersteiner, M. H., Oppenheimer, M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1178797 · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types
Wang, M., Wu, M. M., & Huo, H. (2007) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/2/024001 · Cited by 481
Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology
Gibbs, H. K., Johnston, M., Foley, J. A., Holloway, T., Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Zaks, D. (2008) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034001 · Cited by 470 · cited 1×
“These values suggest a “carbon payback time” (Gibbs et al. 2008, Fargione et al. 2008) of 28 years.”
Background
Climate Change, Agriculture, and Poverty
Hertel, T. W., & Rosch, S. (2010) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppq016 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Economic Analysis of Land Use in Global Climate Change Policy
Hertel, T. W., Rose, S. K., & Tol, R. S. J. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203882962 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
The Indirect Land Use Impacts of United States Biofuel Policies: The Importance of Acreage, Yield, and Bilateral Trade Responses
Keeney, R., & Hertel, T. W. (2009) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01308.x · Cited by 249
Self-citation
The Global Impacts of Biofuel Mandates
Hertel, T. W., Tyner, W. E., & Birur, D. (2010) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol31-no1-4 · Cited by 235
Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Lee, 2009, An integrated land use database for CGE analysis of climate policy options, 72
Searchinger, 2008, Supporting online materials for: Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change, Science, 1151861
Taheripour, 2009, Biofuels and their byproducts
Villoria, 2009, The role of geography in determining the global land use impacts of biofuels. PhD dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 553

Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Implications of Biofuels: Role of Technology and PolicyPreprint
Chen, X., Huang, H., & Khanna, M. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2001520 · Cited by 14
LCA of biorefinieries -identification of key issues and methodological recommendations
Ahlgren, S., Björklund, A., Ekman, A., Karlsson, H., Berlin, J., Börjesson, P., Ekvall, T., Finnveden, G., Janssen, M., & Strid, I. V. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 14
Bridging Modeling and Certification to Evaluate Low-ILUC-Risk Practices for Biobased Materials with a User-Friendly Tool
Balugani, E., Sumfleth, B., Majer, S., Marazza, D., & Thrän, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14042030 · Cited by 5
An agro-industrial model for the optimization of biodiesel production in Spain to meet the European GHG reduction targets
Escobar, N., Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate, C., Sanjuán, N., Clemente, G., & Rozakis, S. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.111 · Cited by 13
Choices in land representation materially affect modeled biofuel carbon intensity estimates
Plevin, R., Jones, J., Kyle, P., Levy, A. W., Shell, M. J., & Tanner, D. J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131477 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Integration of life cycle assessment and regional emission information in agricultural systems
Kim, J., Ялалтдинова, А. Р., Sirina, N., & Baranovskaya, N. V. (2015) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.7149 · Cited by 13
Ethanol Plant Location and Land Use: A Case Study of CRP and the Ethanol Mandate
Ifft, J., Rajagopal, D., & Weldzuis, R. (2018) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppy007 · Cited by 16
Land use in computable general equilibrium models
Taheripour, F., Zhao, X., Horridge, M., Farrokhi, F., & Tyner, W. E. (2020) · Journal of Global Economic Analysis · doi:10.21642/jgea.050202af · Cited by 13
Criteria prioritization for the sustainable development of second-generation bioethanol in Thailand using the Delphi-AHP technique
Jusakulvijit, P., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2021) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-021-00313-5 · Cited by 13
Advanced biofuels: a path to sustainable energy
Maharjan, A., Kim, M.-R., Choi, W., Kim, H.-C., & Park, J. (2024) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/d4se00536h · Cited by 12
Comparative Analysis of Bioenergy Crop Impacts on Water Quality Using Static and Dynamic Land Use Change Modeling Approach
Kumar, E. S., Saraswat, D., & Singh, G. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12020410 · Cited by 12
Review of Integrated Ecological-Economic Analyses for Bioenergy Plants Under Climate Change at Local Scale
Nguyễn, T. T., & Tenhunen, J. (2013) · International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management · doi:10.1108/ijccsm-04-2012-0020 · Cited by 13
Integrating life-cycle assessment and choice analysis for alternative fuel valuation
Winden, M. W., Cruze, N. B., Haab, T. C., & Bakshi, B. R. (2014) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.03.008 · Cited by 12
Chapter 6 Modeling Biofuels Policies in General Equilibrium: Insights, Pitfalls, and Opportunities
Golub, A., Hertel, T. W., Taheripour, F., & Tyner, W. E. (2010) · Frontiers of economics and globalisation · doi:10.1108/s1574-8715(2010)0000007009 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Implications of biofuel production on direct and indirect land use change: Evidence from Brazil
Elobeid, A. E., Moreira, M. M. R., Lima, C. Z. D., Carriquiry, M., & Harfuch, L. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803954-0.00007-3 · Cited by 10
Food, fuel, and the hidden margins of capital
Richards, P. D. (2011) · Journal of Land Use Science · doi:10.1080/1747423x.2011.565373 · Cited by 12
Carbon Offsetting: An Efficient Way to Reduce Emissions or to Avoid Reducing Emissions? An Investigation and Analysis of Offsetting Design and Practice in India and China
Haya, B. K. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 12
Biofuels Induced Land Use Change Emissions: The Role of Implemented Land Use Emission Factors
Taheripour, F., Mueller, S., Emery, I., Karami, O., Sajedinia, E., Zhuang, Q., & Wang, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16072729 · Cited by 11
Biofuels and Their Potential in South Korea
Hochman, G., & Tabakis, C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12177215 · Cited by 11
Dynamic linking of upstream energy and freight demands for bio and fossil energy pathways in the Global Change Analysis Model
Sampedro, J., Kyle, P. G., Ramig, C., Tanner, D., Huster, J. E., & Wise, M. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117580 · Cited by 11
Light-duty vehicle fleet electrification in the United States and its effects on global agricultural markets
Dumortier, J., Elobeid, A., & Carriquiry, M. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107536 · Cited by 11
Land use effects of biofuel production in the US
Wang, W., & Khanna, M. (2023) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/acd1d7 · Cited by 14
Environmental performance of gasified willow from different lands including land‐use changes
Salinas, K. S. D. B., Hauschild, M. Z., Pilegaard, K., & Ibrom, A. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12378 · Cited by 12
Implications of carbon forestry for local livelihoods and leakage
Dyer, G. A., & Nijnik, M. (2013) · Annals of Forest Science · doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0293-9 · Cited by 11
Land Use in the 21st Century: Contributing to the Global Public Good
Hertel, T. W. (2017) · Review of Development Economics · doi:10.1111/rode.12295 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Land Use Change under Biofuel Policies and a Tax on Meat and Dairy Products: Considering Complexity in Agricultural Production Chains Matters
Delzeit, R., Winkler, M., & Söder, M. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10020419 · Cited by 10
Low carbon fuel policy and analysis
Yeh, S., & Sperling, D. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.008 · Cited by 10
Response to “how robust are reductions in modeled estimates from GTAP-BIO of the indirect land use change induced by conventional biofuels?”
Taheripour, F., Mueller, S., & Kwon, H. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127431 · Cited by 10
Climate change, ecosystem services, and costs of action and inaction: scoping the interface
Rodríguez‐Labajos, B. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.247 · Cited by 14
Land-based greenhouse gas emission offset and leakage discounting
Kim, M., Peralta, D., & McCarl, B. A. (2014) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.009 · Cited by 10
Driving factors of temporal variation in agricultural soil respiration
Wang, Y., Bölter, M., Chang, Q., Duttmann, R., Scheltz, A., Petersen, J. F., & Wang, Z. (2015) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science · doi:10.1080/09064710.2015.1036305 · Cited by 10
Monetized value of the environmental, health and resource externalities of soy biodiesel
Winden, M. W., Cruze, N. B., Haab, T. C., & Bakshi, B. R. (2014) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.019 · Cited by 10
Sustainable biomass for energy and materials: A greenhouse gas emission perspective
van der Hilst, F., Hoefnagels, R., Junginger, M., Shen, L., & Wicke, B. (2015) · Cited by 10
Economic Assessment of Ethanol Production
Kohler, M. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811458-2.00019-5 · Cited by 10
Land-Use Changes and CO2 Emissions Due to US Corn Ethanol Production
Tyner, W. E., & Taheripour, F. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384719-5.00362-2 · Cited by 10
Are There Carbon Savings from US Biofuel Policies? The Critical Importance of Accounting for Leakage in Land and Fuel MarketsPreprint
Bento, A. M., Klotz, R. L., & Landry, J. R. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2219503 · Cited by 10
Modeling Biofuels Policies in General Equilibrium: Insights, Pitfalls and Opportunities
Golub, A., Hertel, T. W., Taheripour, F., & Tyner, W. (2010) · GTAP working paper series · doi:10.21642/gtap.wp61 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Understanding Uncertainty in Market-Mediated Responses to US Oilseed Biodiesel Demand: Sensitivity of ILUC Emission Estimates to GLOBIOM Parametric Uncertainty
Escobar, N., Valin, H., Frank, S., Galperin, D., Wade, C. M., Ringwald, L., Tanner, D., Hinkel, N., Havlík, P., Baker, J. S., et al. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c09944 · Cited by 9
Indirect Effects Negate Global Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Substituting Gasoline With Corn Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel in the USA
Brandão, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.814052 · Cited by 9
Could Biofuel Policies Increase Death and Disease in Developing Countries
Goklany, I. M. (2011) · Cited by 9
On mitigating emissions leakage under biofuel policies
Rajagopal, D. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12262 · Cited by 9
Utilization of Food Waste for Biofuel Production
Pandey, K., Yadav, A. K., & Goel, C. (2022) · Clean Energy Production Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0813-2_1 · Cited by 9
Looking beyond calculative spaces of biofuels: Onto-topologies of indirect land use changes
Humalisto, N. H., & Joronen, M. (2013) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.013 · Cited by 9
Biodiesel in Brazil: science, technology and innovation indicators
Rocha, Â. M., Quintella, C. M. A. L. T. D. M. H., Torres, E. A., & Silva, M. S. (2015) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2015.072984 · Cited by 9
Modeling the Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of BiofuelsPreprint
Janda, K., Krištoufek, L., & Zilberman, D. (2011) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
DART-BIO: Modelling the interplay of food, feed and fuels in a global CGE modelPreprint
Calzadilla, A., Delzeit, R., & Klepper, G. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
‘Sustainable’ biofuels in the global South
Hunsberger, C. A., & Ponte, S. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.005 · Cited by 9
Climate policy uncertainty and economic growth, a moderating role of crude oil price changes: evidence from the Asian economies
Ullah, S., Yushi, J., & Miao, M. (2024) · International Journal of Energy Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijesm-12-2023-0024 · Cited by 8
Environmental Impact and Economic Benefits of Biofuel Production
Sahoo, G., Wani, A. M., Swamy, S. L., & Sharma, A. (2022) · Clean Energy Production Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8090-8_16 · Cited by 9
The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California
Freer‐Smith, P., Bailey‐Bale, J., Donnison, C. L., & Taylor, G. (2023) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.13101 · Cited by 9
Recent Developments and Challenges in Projecting the Impact of Crop Productivity Growth on Biodiversity Considering Market-Mediated Effects
Chaudhary, A., & Hertel, T. W. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c05137 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
DAGENS OCH FRAMTIDENS HÅLLBARA BIODRIVMEDEL
Börjesson, P., Lundgren, J., Ahlgren, S., Lantbruksuniversitet, S., & Nyström, I. (2013) · Cited by 8
Corn oil biofuel land use change emission impacts: sharing emission savings between ethanol and biodiesel
Taheripour, F., & Tyner, W. E. (2014) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2014.977582 · Cited by 8
A dynamic simulation of the ILUC effects of biofuel use in the USA
Oladosu, G. A., & Kline, K. L. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.124 · Cited by 8
Modeled and Measured Ecosystem Respiration in Maize–Soybean Systems Over 10 Years
Zhan, M., Liska, A. J., Nguy-Robertson, A. L., Suyker, A. E., Pelton, M. P., & Yang, H. S. (2018) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2018.02.0086 · Cited by 9
Global impact of multinational biofuel mandates on land use, feedstock prices, international trade and land-use greenhouse gas emissions
Banse, M., Junker, F., Prins, A. G., Stehfest, E., Tabeau, A., Woltjer, G. B., & van Meijl, H. (2014) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · doi:10.3220/lbf_2014_59-72 · Cited by 8
Biomass Provision and Use, Sustainability Aspects
van der Hilst, F., Hoefnagels, R., Junginger, M., Londo, M., Shen, L., & Wicke, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1048-1 · Cited by 8
Trade-induced land-use transitions and greenhouse gas emissions: The case of the EU-Mercosur free-trade agreement
Cordova, J. A. M., & Koo, Y. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139327 · Cited by 9
An assessment of the influence of bioenergy and marketed land amenity values on land uses in the Midwestern US
Choi, S.-W., Sohngen, B., & Alig, R. J. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.005 · Cited by 7
Livestock Demand, Global Land Use Changes, and Induced Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Dhoubhadel, S. P., Taheripour, F., & Stockton, M. C. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Protection · doi:10.4236/jep.2016.77087 · Cited by 7
Existing Modeling Platforms for Biomass Supply in Europe
Elbersen, B. S., Forsell, N., Leduc, S., Staritsky, I. G., Witzke, P., & Ramirez-Almeyda, J. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812303-4.00002-1 · Cited by 7
CHANGES IN GLOBAL LAND USE AND CO2 EMISSIONS FROM US BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION: WHAT DRIVES DIFFERENCES IN ESTIMATES BETWEEN CORN AND CELLULOSIC ETHANOL?
Mignone, B. K., Huster, J. E., Torkamani, S., O’Rourke, P., & Wise, M. (2022) · Climate Change Economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007822500087 · Cited by 9
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS)
Fajardy, M. (2022) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781839165245-00080 · Cited by 7
Land competition and welfare effects from Mexico's proposal to ban genetically engineered corn
Beckman, J. F., Nava, N. J., Williams, A., & Zahniser, S. (2024) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12463 · Cited by 7
Modeling for Integrating Science and Management
Dale, V. H., & Kline, K. L. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511894824.011 · Cited by 7
Application of US and EU Sustainability Criteria to Analysis of Biofuels-Induced Land Use Change
Treesilvattanakul, K., Taheripour, F., & Tyner, W. E. (2014) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en7085119 · Cited by 7
Production of Pig Feed under Future Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations: Changes in Crop Content and Chemical Composition, Land Use, Environmental Impact, and Socio-Economic Consequences
Saxe, H., Hamelin, L., Hinrichsen, T., & Wenzel, H. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10093184 · Cited by 7
Piecemeal or combined? Assessing greenhouse gas mitigation spillovers in US forest and agriculture policy portfolios
Galik, C. S., Latta, G. S., & Gambino, C. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1663719 · Cited by 7
Biofuels: review of policies and impactsPreprint
Janda, K., Krištoufek, L., & Zilberman, D. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.120415 · Cited by 6
Economic and Environmental Analyses of Biomass Utilization for Bioenergy Products in the Northeastern United States.
Liu, W. (2015) · doi:10.33915/etd.8171 · Cited by 7
Earth-Economy Modeling: Advances in Linking Economic and Ecosystem Models
Johnson, J. A., Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Chapman, M., Polasky, S., & Williams, B. A. (2025) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-013024-033043 · Cited by 13
Global Implications of U.S. Biofuels Policies in an Integrated Partial and General Equilibrium Framework
Birur, D., Beach, R., Hertel, T. W., & McCarl, B. A. (2010) · PubMed · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.61812 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Life cycle assessment is the most relevant framework to evaluate biofuel greenhouse gas burdens
Kleine, R. D. D., Anderson, J. E., Kim, H. C., & Wallington, T. J. (2017) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1752 · Cited by 6
Future Biofuel Production and Water Usage
Arshad, M. I., & Abbas, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66408-8_6 · Cited by 6
Negative Emissions Technologies
Daggash, H. A., Fajardy, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788012744-00447 · Cited by 6
The importance of agricultural yield elasticity for indirect land use change: a Bayesian network analysis for robust uncertainty quantification
Perkins, O., & Millington, J. D. A. (2020) · Journal of Land Use Science · doi:10.1080/1747423x.2020.1774672 · Cited by 7
Biological Control of Fusarium Stalk Rot of Maize Using Bacillus spp.
Han, J.-H., Park, G.-C., Kim, J.-O., & Kim, K. S. (2015) · Research in Plant Disease · doi:10.5423/rpd.2015.21.4.280 · Cited by 6
Sustainable Vehicle Fuels, Well-to-Wheel Analysis
Elgowainy, A., Wang, M., & Reddi, K. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1492-1_868 · Cited by 6
Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reijnders, L. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_2 · Cited by 8
Annual Basis Carbon (ABC) Analysis of Biofuel Production at the Facility LevelPreprint
DeCicco, J., & Krishnan, R. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2643155 · Cited by 6
Research on Plastic Mitigation Underestimates the Potential Land‐Use Impact of Bio‐Based Plastic Alternatives
Helm, L. T. (2025) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.70024 · Cited by 5
Quantifying the benefits of reducing synthetic nitrogen application policy on ecosystem carbon sequestration and biodiversity
Devaraju, N., Prudhomme, R., Lungarska, A., Wang, X., Yin, Z., de Noblet‐Ducoudré, N., Chakir, R., Jayet, P.-A., Brunelle, T., Viovy, N., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-24794-2 · Cited by 5
Indirekt förändrad markanvändning och biodrivmedel - en kunskapsöversikt
Ahlgren, S., & Börjesson, P. (2011) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 5
Development of Corn Stover Biofuel: Impacts on Corn and Soybean Markets and Crop Rotation
Taheripour, F., Fiegel, J., & Tyner, W. E. (2015) · Sustainable Agriculture Research · doi:10.5539/sar.v5n1p1 · Cited by 5
Unravelling Land-Use Change Mechanisms at Global and Regional Scales
Brunelle, T., Dumas, P., Aoun, W. B., & Gabrielle, B. (2018) · BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality · doi:10.1007/s41247-018-0047-2 · Cited by 5
Measuring the environmental impacts of agricultural research: Theory and Applications to CGIAR research
Bennett, J., Renkow, M., Stevenson, J. R., Byerlee, D., Villoria, N. B., Kelley, T., & Maredia, M. K. (2011) · Cited by 5
Estimation of the value-added/intermediate input substitution elasticities consistent with the GTAP data
Ivanic, M., Beckman, J., & Nava, N. J. (2023) · Journal of Global Economic Analysis · doi:10.21642/jgea.080204af · Cited by 7
The Long-Run Impact of Biofuels on Food PricesPreprint
Chakravorty, U. N., Hubert, M., Michel Moreaux, C., & Nøstbakken, L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2685685 · Cited by 5
Biofuels, Bio‐Power, and Bio‐Products from Sustainable Biomass: Coupling Energy Crops and Organic Waste with Clean Energy Technologies
Guran, S., Agblevor, F. A., & Brennan‐Tonetta, M. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9783527803293.ch8 · Cited by 5
Assessing the potential for biofuel production within a conventional fuel system
Dragicevic, A. Z., Thongtai, C., & Pecora, N. (2025) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108991 · Cited by 4
Advancing Life-Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Sustainable Agrifood Systems
Xiao, J., & Yang, Y. (2025) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture15242561 · Cited by 5
Advanced Biofuels: Economic Uncertainties, Policy Options, and Land Use Impacts
Tyner, W. E., & Taheripour, F. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9329-7_3 · Cited by 4
A Review of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Worldwide Hake Fishing
Vázquez‐Rowe, I., Villanueva-Rey, P., Moreira, M. T., & Feijóo, G. (2014) · Ecoproduction · doi:10.1007/978-981-4585-75-0_1 · Cited by 4
Evaluating the environmental cost of biofuels policy: An illustration with bioethanol
Valin, H., Dimaranan, B., & Bouët, A. (2010) · International Economics · doi:10.1016/s2110-7017(13)60031-1 · Cited by 4
Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Implications of Biofuels: Role of Technology and Policy
Chen, X., & Khanna, M. (2017) · Natural resource management and policy · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6906-7_9 · Cited by 4
Assessment of the emissions and energy impacts of biomass and biogas use in California
Dabdub, D. (2015) · Cited by 4
The Effect of Forest Growth Rate on Climate Change Impacts of Logging Residue Utilization
Gan, X., Guo, B., Ma, Z., Fang, M., Yan, Y., & Liu, W. (2023) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos14081270 · Cited by 4
Driving Sustainability: Exploring Global Green Banking Initiatives for a Greener Future
Rakshitha, J., & Chaya, R. (2023) · doi:10.1177/22297561231215188 · Cited by 4
Advances, Applications, Challenges and Future Prospects of Recent Technologies in Biofuel Production
Geetha, B., Shreenidhi, K. S., Nivaas, R., Raghasree, T., & Kumar, B. R. (2024) · Environmental science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52167-6_26 · Cited by 4
Biomass Resources, Worldwide
Faaij, A. P. C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7813-7_259 · Cited by 4

Authors: Hertel, T. W., Golub, A. A., Jones, A. D., O'Hare, M., Plevin, R. J., & Kammen, D. M.
ORCID: Hertel, Thomas W.
Golub, Alla A.
Jones, Andrew D.
Plevin, Richard J.
Kammen, Daniel M.
Venue: BioScience
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published: 2010-03
Volume: 60
Issue: 3
Pages: 223-231
ISSN: 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
1525-3244
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.8
OpenAlex: W2042467966
Semantic Scholar: 1711415b8f00f64c8855c6364d4157fd312a433f
Cited by: 554
References: 19
Citations by year: 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 49
FWCI: 59.78
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: BioScience (publishedVersion)
BioOne Complete (BioOne) (publishedVersion)
HighWire Press Open Archive (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords: indirect land use change, greenhouse gas emissions, biofuels, cropland conversion, CO2 emissions, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, climate policy, energy security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks