Cited by 634Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Implications of Dam Obstruction for Global Freshwater Fish Diversity

Open access
Liermann, Catherine Reidy, Nilsson, Christer, Robertson, James, Ng, Rebecca Y.·2012·BioScience

Abstract

Dams are obstructing rivers worldwide, impairing habitat and migration opportunities for many freshwater fish species; however, global data linking dam and fish distributions have been limited. Here, we quantify dam obstruction at the biogeographic scale of freshwater ecoregion, which provides the spatial framework necessary to assess the risk of fish species loss due to dams and allows us to identify both ecoregions and genera at risk. Nearly 50% of the 397 assessed freshwater ecoregions are obstructed by large- and medium-size dams, and approximately 27% face additional downstream obstruction. A synthesis of obstruction data and fish traits indicates that taxa such as lampreys (Lampetra spp.), eels (Anguilla spp.), and shads (Alosa spp.) are at particular risk of species loss. Threatened ecoregions with heavy dam obstruction and above-average counts of total, diadromous, or endemic species are found on all continents and include the Murray—Darling Province, Southern Italy, the Lower and Middle Indus Basin, West Korea, the South Atlantic region of the United States, the Upper Paraná, and Mobile Bay ecoregions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.5

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CSI and the FFR methodology presented here provide metrics for evaluating river connectivity as one of the fundamental components of ecosystem health.

    “The CSI and the FFR methodology presented here provide metrics for evaluating river connectivity as one of the fundamental components of ecosystem health ( 27-29 ).”

    From Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Roberts TR. 2001. On the river of no returns: Thailand's Pak Mun Dam and its fish ladder. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 49: 189-230.
  2. Winston MR, Taylor CM, Pigg J. 1991. Upstream extirpation of four min- now species due to damming of a prairie stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120: 98-105.
  3. Nielsen JL, Carpanzano C, Fountain MC, Gan CA. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellite diversity in hatchery and wild Oncorhynchus mykiss from freshwater habitats in southern California. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126: 397-417.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liermann, C. R., Nilsson, C., Robertson, J., & Ng, R. Y.
Venue
BioScience
Published
2012-06
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
539-548
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W1895973273
Cited by
634
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nature Conservancy
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
freshwater fish diversity, freshwater ecoregions, fish migration, habitat fragmentation, lamprey, eel, shad, diadromous fish, endemic species, Murray-Darling Basin, Indus Basin, Paraná River, Mobile Bay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review