Cited by 339Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

The fire frequency‐severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests

Open access
Steel, Zachary L., Safford, Hugh D., Viers, Joshua H.·2015·Ecosphere

Abstract

Fire is one of the most important natural disturbance processes in the western United States and ecosystems differ markedly with respect to their ecological and evolutionary relationships with fire. Reference fire regimes in forested ecosystems can be categorized along a gradient ranging from “fuel‐limited” to “climate‐limited” where the former types are often characterized by frequent, lower‐severity wildfires and the latter by infrequent, more severe wildfires. Using spatial data on fire severity from 1984–2011 and metrics related to fire frequency, we tested how divergence from historic (pre‐Euroamerican settlement) fire frequencies due to a century of fire suppression influences rates of high‐severity fire in five forest types in California. With some variation among bioregions, our results suggest that fires in forest types characterized by fuel‐limited fire regimes (e.g., yellow pine and mixed conifer forest) tend to burn with greater proportions of high‐severity fire as either time since last fire or the mean modern fire return interval (FRI) increases. Two intermediate fire regime types (mixed evergreen and bigcone Douglas‐fir) showed a similar relationship between fire frequency and fire severity. However, red fir and redwood forests, which are characterized by more climate‐limited fire regimes, did not show significant positive relationships between FRI and fire severity. This analysis provides strong evidence that for fuel‐limited fire regimes, lack of fire leads to increasing rates of high‐severity burning. Our study also substantiates the general validity of “fuel‐limited” vs. “climate‐limited” explanations of differing patterns of fire effects and response in forest types of the western US.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/es14-00224.1

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combined with drought conditions and the expanded range of flammable invasive species, fire suppression policies have primed California ecosystems for exceedingly hot and destructive fires.

    “Combined with drought conditions and the expanded range of flammable invasive species, these fire suppression policies have primed California ecosystems for exceedingly hot and destructive fires”

    From Invasive species, extreme fire risk, and toxin release under a changing climate (2020) · cites this paper as Steel et al. 2015

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) link fire suppression, accumulated fuels, and drier fire seasons to increasingly large, severe wildfires in fuel-limited forests. The paper does not say that an expanded range of flammable invasive species helped prime those fires; its Mixed conifer and mixed evergreen section mentions invasive species as a stressor that may contribute to ecosystem conversion after severe fire. The claim also extends the forest-specific finding to California ecosystems generally. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A fourth category is 'ignition-limited' systems, where dry fuels are abundant but lacking non-human ignition sources.

    “A fourth category is 'ignition-limited' systems, where dry fuels are abundant but lacking non-human ignition sources, such as lowland sclerophyllous shrublands in California (Steel, Safford, & Viers, 2015) and Mediterranean shrublands in Chile (Keeley et al., 2012).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Steel, Safford, & Viers, 2015

  • The West Coast experiences catastrophic wildfires fueled by climate change-driven droughts and a hundred years of misinformed forest management strategies.

    “At the same time, the West Coast experiences catastrophic wildfires fueled by climate change-driven droughts [2] and a hundred years of misinformed forest management strategies [35],Steel, Safford, and [24, 38].”
  • As the number of dead trees and plant material increases, the opportunity for significant dry fuel loading also grows, amplifying the risk of disastrous fires.

    “As the number of dead trees and plant material increases, the opportunity for significant dry fuel loading also grows, amplifying the risk of disastrous fires”

    From Invasive species, extreme fire risk, and toxin release under a changing climate (2020) · cites this paper as Steel et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Keeley, J. D., W. J. Bond, R. A. Bradstock, J. G. Pausas, and P. W. Rundel. 2012. Fire in mediterranean ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK.
  2. in N. G. Sugihara, J. W. van Wagtendonk, K. E. Shaffer, J. Fites-Kaufman, and A. E. Thode, editors. Fire in California's ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
  3. McDonald, P. M. 1990. Pseudotsuga macrocarpa (Vasey) Mayr bigcone Douglas-fir. Pages 520-526 in R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala, editors. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agricultural Hand- book 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
  4. Minnich, R. A. 1980. Wildfire and the geographic relationships between canyon live oak, Coulter pine, and bigcone Douglas-fir forests. In T. R. Plumb, editor. Proceedings of the symposium on ecology, management, and utilization of California oaks. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Soutwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Claremont, Cali- fornia, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steel, Z. L., Safford, H. D., & Viers, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Safford, Hugh D.
Venue
Ecosphere
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095881123
Cited by
339
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecosphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
fire suppression legacy, fire regimes, fire return interval, high-severity fire, time since last fire, mixed conifer forest, redwood forests, mixed evergreen forest, California forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review