Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 128

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From the Margins

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt·1994·Cultural Anthropology

Abstract

How can anthropology benefit from cultural studies and cultural studies benefit from anthropology? One area in which these two scholarly trajectories work best together is in theorizing the interface of local and global frames of analysis. The challenge here is to move from situated, that is "local," controversies to widely circulating or "global" issues of power and knowledge and back, as this allows us to develop understandings of the institutions and dialogues in which both local and global cultural agendas are shaped. This essay is about margins as a conceptual site from which to explore the imaginative quality and the specificity of local/global cultural formation. Margins here are not a geographical, descriptive location. Nor do I refer to margins as the sites of deviance from social norms. Instead, I use the term to indicate an analytic placement that makes evident both the constraining, oppressive quality of cultural exclusion and the creative potential of rearticulating, enlivening, and rearranging the very social categories that peripheralize a group's existence. Margins, in this use, are sites from which we see the instability of social categories. One way of thinking about this agenda is to imagine a conversation between the approaches of Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci. Foucault shows us the discursive construction of social categories and forms of subjectivity. Gramsci reminds us that these categories and their associated kinds of agency have no unquestioned hegemony. Where Gramsci assumes too much about self-evident political interests that produce resistance and social transformation, Foucault, in showing the convention-laden assumptions behind resistance, obscures the suspense that infects possibilities of change. My interest is in the zones of unpredictability at the edges of discursive stability, where contradictory discourses overlap, or where discrepant kinds of meaning-making converge; these are what I call margins. Attention to marginality highlights both the play and constraint of subordinate social positions. In the United States, for example, minorities are marginalized by exclusion from the assumption of being ordinary-and often the jobs, housing, or political opportunities that "ordinary" (white) people expect. At the

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/can.1994.9.3.02a00020

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Anderson, 1987, Southeast Asian Tribal Groups and Ethnic Minorities, 1
  2. Baudrillard, 1988, Selected Writings
  3. Boon, 1977, The Anthropological Romance of Bali: 1597-1972
  4. Geertz, 1983, Local Knowledge
  5. Koesnoe, 1971, Introduction into Indonesian Adat Law
  6. Rabinow, Paul, ed. 1988. Anthropology and the Analysis of Modernity. Theme issue. Cultural Anthropology 3(4).
  7. Sahlins, 1985, Islands of History
  8. Said, 1978, Orientalism
  9. Taylor, 1984, The Social Life of Batavia: European and Eurasian in Dutch Asia
  10. Tsing, Anna 1993a Adat, Land Rights, and Cultural Citizenship in Indonesia. Paper presented at the Conference on Cultural Citizenship in Southeast Asia, Honolulu, HI, May.

Metadata

Authors
Tsing, A. L.
Venue
Cultural Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-08
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
279-297
ISSN
  • 0886-7356
  • 1548-1360
Cited by
128
References
20
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 7701 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.