CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 266Gender, Health, and Social InequalityRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Racial and Gender Discrimination in the Stress Process: Implications for African American Women's Health and Well-Being

Open access
Perry, Brea L., Harp, Kathi L. H., Oser, Carrie B.·2013·Sociological Perspectives
DOI 10.1525/sop.2012.56.1.25PMC PMC3783344
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent decades, sociologists have increasingly adopted an intersectionality framework to explore and explain the complex and interconnected nature of inequalities in the areas of race, class, and gender. Using an inclusion-centered approach and a sample of 204 low-socioeconomic-status (SES) African American women, the authors theorize and explore the role of racial and gender discrimination in the stress process. Analyses examine relationships between social stressors (racial and gender discrimination) and individual stressors occurring in each of six distinct social contexts. Furthermore, the authors evaluate the effects of racial and gender discrimination as compared to individual stressors on three indicators of mental health and well-being. Findings suggest that racial and gender discrimination increases risk for poor health and low well-being, working both directly and indirectly through increased vulnerability to individual stressors. This research demonstrates the value of a more comprehensive study of stressors that influence the health of low-SES African American women and other multiply disadvantaged groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/sop.2012.56.1.25

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Brondolo Elizabeth, 2009, Ethnicity and Disease, 15, 14
  2. Brown Diane R., 2003, In and Out of Our Right Minds, 1
  3. Brown Diane R., 2003, In and Out of Our Right Minds, 83
  4. Collins Patricia Hill, 2000, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment
  5. Costello Anna B., 2005, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 1
  6. 10.1177/036168430903300305 · DOI
  7. Hooks Bell, 1981, Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism
  8. McCoy Frank, 1994, Black Enterprise, 25, 54
  9. McLellan Thomas, 1999, Addiction Severity Index Life-Clinical Factors Version
  10. Morris-Prather C. E., 1996, Ethnicity and Disease, 6, 123
  11. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.10.1164 · DOI
  12. Paloutzian Raymond F., 1991, Manual for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale
  13. Sampson Robert J., 2005, Race, Crime, and Justice, 177

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–266 of 266

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Perry, B. L., Harp, K. L. H., & Oser, C. B.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Perry, Brea L.
ORCID
Venue
Sociological Perspectives
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2013-03
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
25-48
ISSN
  • 0731-1214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8673
DOI
10.1525/sop.2012.56.1.25
PMC
PMC3783344
OpenAlex
W4297889213
Cited by
266
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8
FWCI
28.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Sociological Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA021309, R01DA022967, F31DA030061, T32DA035200)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial discrimination, gender discrimination, stress process, African American women, intersectionality, low socioeconomic status, mental health, well-being, social stressors, individual stressors, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review