Cited by 110Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsT-cell and B-cell ImmunologySignaling Pathways in Disease

Inducible chromatin priming is associated with the establishment of immunological memory in T cells

Open access
Bevington, Sarah L, Cauchy, Pierre, Piper, Jason, Bertrand, Elisabeth, Lalli, Naveen, Jarvis, Rebecca C, Gilding, Liam Niall, Ott, Sascha +2 more·2016·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Immunological memory is a defining feature of vertebrate physiology, allowing rapid responses to repeat infections. However, the molecular mechanisms required for its establishment and maintenance remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrated that the first steps in the acquisition of T‐cell memory occurred during the initial activation phase of naïve T cells by an antigenic stimulus. This event initiated extensive chromatin remodeling that reprogrammed immune response genes toward a stably maintained primed state, prior to terminal differentiation. Activation induced the transcription factors NFAT and AP‐1 which created thousands of new DNase I‐hypersensitive sites (DHSs), enabling ETS‐1 and RUNX1 recruitment to previously inaccessible sites. Significantly, these DHSs remained stable long after activation ceased, were preserved following replication, and were maintained in memory‐phenotype cells. We show that primed DHSs maintain regions of active chromatin in the vicinity of inducible genes and enhancers that regulate immune responses. We suggest that this priming mechanism may contribute to immunological memory in T cells by facilitating the induction of nearby inducible regulatory elements in previously activated T cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embj.201592534

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Agarwal S, Rao A (1998) Modulation of chromatin structure regulates cytokine gene expression during T cell differentiation. Immunity 9: 765– 775 9881967
  2. Araki Y, Fann M, Wersto R, Weng NP (2008) Histone acetylation facilitates rapid and robust memory CD8 T cell response through differential expression of effector molecules (eomesodermin and its targets: perforin and granzyme B). J Immunol 180: 8102– 8108 18523274 PMC2493419
  3. Araki Y, Wang Z, Zang C, Wood WH III, Schones D, Cui K, Roh TY, Lhotsky B, Wersto RP, Peng W, Becker KG, Zhao K, Weng NP (2009) Genome‐wide analysis of histone methylation reveals chromatin state‐based regulation of gene transcription and function of memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity 30: 912– 925 19523850 PMC2709841
  4. Badovinac VP, Messingham KA, Jabbari A, Haring JS, Harty JT (2005) Accelerated CD8+ T‐cell memory and prime‐boost response after dendritic‐cell vaccination. Nat Med 11: 748– 756 15951824
  5. Bakshi R, Zaidi SK, Pande S, Hassan MQ, Young DW, Montecino M, Lian JB, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Stein GS (2008) The leukemogenic t(8;21) fusion protein AML1‐ETO controls rRNA genes and associates with nucleolar‐organizing regions at mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Sci 121: 3981– 3990 19001502 PMC2904240
  6. Baxter EW, Mirabella F, Bowers SR, James SR, Bonavita AM, Bertrand E, Strogantsev R, Hawwari A, Bert AG, Gonzalez de Arce A, West AG, Bonifer C, Cockerill PN (2012) The inducible tissue‐specific expression of the human IL‐3/GM‐CSF locus is controlled by a complex array of developmentally regulated enhancers. J Immunol 189: 4459– 4469 23024272 PMC3480713
  7. Bert AG, Johnson BV, Baxter EW, Cockerill PN (2007) A modular enhancer is differentially regulated by GATA and NFAT elements that direct different tissue‐specific patterns of nucleosome positioning and inducible chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell Biol 27: 2870– 2885 17283044 PMC1899937
  8. Brownlie RJ, Zamoyska R (2013) T cell receptor signalling networks: branched, diversified and bounded. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 257– 269 23524462
  9. Cockerill PN, Bert AG, Jenkins F, Ryan GR, Shannon MF, Vadas MA (1995) Human GM‐CSF enhancer function is associated with cooperative interactions between AP‐1 and NFATp/c. Mol Cell Biol 15: 2071– 2079 7891702 PMC230434
  10. Cockerill PN, Bert AG, Roberts D, Vadas MA (1999) The human granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor gene is autonomously regulated in vivo by an inducible tissue‐specific enhancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 15097– 15102 10611344 PMC24779
  11. Cockerill PN (2004) Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the human IL‐3/GM‐CSF locus by inducible tissue‐specific promoters and enhancers. Crit Rev Immunol 24: 385– 408 15777160
  12. Cockerill PN (2011) Structure and function of active chromatin and DNase I hypersensitive sites. FEBS J 278: 2182– 2210 21501387
  13. Crompton JG, Narayanan M, Cuddapah S, Roychoudhuri R, Ji Y, Yang W, Patel SJ, Sukumar M, Palmer DC, Peng W, Wang E, Marincola FM, Klebanoff CA, Zhao K, Tsang JS, Gattinoni L, Restifo NP (2015) Lineage relationship of CD8 T cell subsets is revealed by progressive changes in the epigenetic landscape. Cell Mol Immunol doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.032 PMC4947817 25914936 · DOI
  14. Cunningham L, Finckbeiner S, Hyde RK, Southall N, Marugan J, Yedavalli VR, Dehdashti SJ, Reinhold WC, Alemu L, Zhao L, Yeh JR, Sood R, Pommier Y, Austin CP, Jeang KT, Zheng W, Liu P (2012) Identification of benzodiazepine Ro5‐3335 as an inhibitor of CBF leukemia through quantitative high throughput screen against RUNX1‐CBFbeta interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 14592– 14597 22912405 PMC3437880
  15. Dogan N, Wu W, Morrissey CS, Chen KB, Stonestrom A, Long M, Keller CA, Cheng Y, Jain D, Visel A, Pennacchio LA, Weiss MJ, Blobel GA, Hardison RC (2015) Occupancy by key transcription factors is a more accurate predictor of enhancer activity than histone modifications or chromatin accessibility. Epigenetics Chromatin 8: 16 25984238 PMC4432502
  16. Egawa T, Tillman RE, Naoe Y, Taniuchi I, Littman DR (2007) The role of the Runx transcription factors in thymocyte differentiation and in homeostasis of naive T cells. J Exp Med 204: 1945– 1957 17646406 PMC2118679
  17. Fields PE, Lee GR, Kim ST, Bartsevich VV, Flavell RA (2004) Th2‐specific chromatin remodeling and enhancer activity in the Th2 cytokine locus control region. Immunity 21: 865– 876 15589174
  18. Hashimoto S, Ogoshi K, Sasaki A, Abe J, Qu W, Nakatani Y, Ahsan B, Oshima K, Shand FH, Ametani A, Suzuki Y, Kaneko S, Wada T, Hattori M, Sugano S, Morishita S, Matsushima K (2013) Coordinated changes in DNA methylation in antigen‐specific memory CD4 T cells. J Immunol 190: 4076– 4091 23509353 PMC3619526
  19. Hawwari A, Burrows J, Vadas MA, Cockerill PN (2002) The human IL‐3 locus is regulated cooperatively by two NFAT‐dependent enhancers that have distinct tissue‐specific activities. J Immunol 169: 1876– 1886 12165512
  20. Heinz S, Romanoski CE, Benner C, Allison KA, Kaikkonen MU, Orozco LD, Glass CK (2013) Effect of natural genetic variation on enhancer selection and function. Nature 503: 487– 492 24121437 PMC3994126
  21. Hogan PG, Chen L, Nardone J, Rao A (2003) Transcriptional regulation by calcium, calcineurin, and NFAT. Genes Dev 17: 2205– 2232 12975316
  22. Hsiung CC, Morrissey CS, Udugama M, Frank CL, Keller CA, Baek S, Giardine B, Crawford GE, Sung MH, Hardison RC, Blobel GA (2015) Genome accessibility is widely preserved and locally modulated during mitosis. Genome Res 25: 213– 225 25373146 PMC4315295
  23. Johnson BV, Bert AG, Ryan GR, Condina A, Cockerill PN (2004) GM‐CSF enhancer activation requires cooperation between NFAT and AP‐1 elements and is associated with extensive nucleosome reorganization. Mol Cell Biol 24: 7914– 7930 15340054 PMC515070
  24. Jones EA, Flavell RA (2005) Distal enhancer elements transcribe intergenic RNA in the IL‐10 family gene cluster. J Immunol 175: 7437– 7446 16301651
  25. Kadauke S, Udugama MI, Pawlicki JM, Achtman JC, Jain DP, Cheng Y, Hardison RC, Blobel GA (2012) Tissue‐specific mitotic bookmarking by hematopoietic transcription factor GATA1. Cell 150: 725– 737 22901805 PMC3425057
  26. Kedzierska K, Stambas J, Jenkins MR, Keating R, Turner SJ, Doherty PC (2007) Location rather than CD62L phenotype is critical in the early establishment of influenza‐specific CD8+ T cell memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 9782– 9787 17522251 PMC1887603
  27. Komori HK, Hart T, LaMere SA, Chew PV, Salomon DR (2015) Defining CD4 T cell memory by the epigenetic landscape of CpG DNA methylation. J Immunol 194: 1565– 1579 25576597 PMC4364524
  28. Kwasnieski JC, Fiore C, Chaudhari HG, Cohen BA (2014) High‐throughput functional testing of ENCODE segmentation predictions. Genome Res 24: 1595– 1602 25035418 PMC4199366
  29. Lara‐Astiaso D, Weiner A, Lorenzo‐Vivas E, Zaretsky I, Jaitin DA, David E, Keren‐Shaul H, Mildner A, Winter D, Jung S, Friedman N, Amit I (2014) Immunogenetics. Chromatin state dynamics during blood formation. Science 345: 943– 949 25103404 PMC4412442
  30. Lee GR, Fields PE, Flavell RA (2001) Regulation of IL‐4 gene expression by distal regulatory elements and GATA‐3 at the chromatin level. Immunity 14: 447– 459 11336690
  31. Lee GR, Spilianakis CG, Flavell RA (2005) Hypersensitive site 7 of the TH2 locus control region is essential for expressing TH2 cytokine genes and for long‐range intrachromosomal interactions. Nat Immunol 6: 42– 48 15608641
  32. Lichtinger M, Ingram R, Hannah R, Muller D, Clarke D, Assi SA, Lie ALM, Noailles L, Vijayabaskar MS, Wu M, Tenen DG, Westhead DR, Kouskoff V, Lacaud G, Gottgens B, Bonifer C (2012) RUNX1 reshapes the epigenetic landscape at the onset of haematopoiesis. EMBO J 31: 4318– 4333 23064151 PMC3501222
  33. Martinez‐Balbas MA, Dey A, Rabindran SK, Ozato K, Wu C (1995) Displacement of sequence‐specific transcription factors from mitotic chromatin. Cell 83: 29– 38 7553870
  34. Mirabella F, Baxter EW, Boissinot M, James SR, Cockerill PN (2010) The human IL‐3/granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor locus is epigenetically silent in immature thymocytes and is progressively activated during T cell development. J Immunol 184: 3043– 3054 20147630
  35. Nakayama T, Yamashita M (2009) Critical role of the Polycomb and Trithorax complexes in the maintenance of CD4 T cell memory. Semin Immunol 21: 78– 83 19269851
  36. Pande S, Ali SA, Dowdy C, Zaidi SK, Ito K, Ito Y, Montecino MA, Lian JB, Stein JL, van Wijnen AJ, Stein GS (2009) Subnuclear targeting of the Runx3 tumor suppressor and its epigenetic association with mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Physiol 218: 473– 479 19006109 PMC2886710
  37. Piper J, Elze MC, Cauchy P, Cockerill PN, Bonifer C, Ott S (2013) Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identification of digital genomic footprints from DNase‐seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 41: e201 24071585 PMC3834841
  38. Rivera CM, Ren B (2013) Mapping human epigenomes. Cell 155: 39– 55 24074860 PMC3838898
  39. Rogers PR, Dubey C, Swain SL (2000) Qualitative changes accompany memory T cell generation: faster, more effective responses at lower doses of antigen. J Immunol 164: 2338– 2346 10679068
  40. Rothenberg EV, Zhang JA (2012) T‐cell identity and epigenetic memory. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 356: 117– 143 21833836 PMC3679184
  41. Russ BE, Olshanksy M, Smallwood HS, Li J, Denton AE, Prier JE, Stock AT, Croom HA, Cullen JG, Nguyen ML, Rowe S, Olson MR, Finkelstein DB, Kelso A, Thomas PG, Speed TP, Rao S, Turner SJ (2014) Distinct epigenetic signatures delineate transcriptional programs during virus‐specific CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Immunity 41: 853– 865 25517617 PMC4479393
  42. Seumois G, Chavez L, Gerasimova A, Lienhard M, Omran N, Kalinke L, Vedanayagam M, Ganesan AP, Chawla A, Djukanovic R, Ansel KM, Peters B, Rao A, Vijayanand P (2014) Epigenomic analysis of primary human T cells reveals enhancers associated with TH2 memory cell differentiation and asthma susceptibility. Nat Immunol 15: 777– 788 24997565 PMC4140783
  43. Sprent J, Surh CD (2002) T cell memory. Annu Rev Immunol 20: 551– 579 11861612
  44. Telfer JC, Rothenberg EV (2001) Expression and function of a stem cell promoter for the murine CBFalpha2 gene: distinct roles and regulation in natural killer and T cell development. Dev Biol 229: 363– 382 11203699
  45. Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, Haugen E, Sheffield NC, Stergachis AB, Wang H, Vernot B, Garg K, John S, Sandstrom R, Bates D, Boatman L, Canfield TK, Diegel M, Dunn D, Ebersol AK, Frum T et al (2012) The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489: 75– 82 22955617 PMC3721348
  46. Wei G, Wei L, Zhu J, Zang C, Hu‐Li J, Yao Z, Cui K, Kanno Y, Roh TY, Watford WT, Schones DE, Peng W, Sun HW, Paul WE, O'Shea JJ, Zhao K (2009) Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. Immunity 30: 155– 167 19144320 PMC2722509
  47. Yamashita M, Shinnakasu R, Nigo Y, Kimura M, Hasegawa A, Taniguchi M, Nakayama T (2004) Interleukin (IL)‐4‐independent maintenance of histone modification of the IL‐4 gene loci in memory Th2 cells. J Biol Chem 279: 39454– 39464 15258154
  48. Young DW, Hassan MQ, Pratap J, Galindo M, Zaidi SK, Lee SH, Yang X, Xie R, Javed A, Underwood JM, Furcinitti P, Imbalzano AN, Penman S, Nickerson JA, Montecino MA, Lian JB, Stein JL, van Wijnen AJ, Stein GS (2007) Mitotic occupancy and lineage‐specific transcriptional control of rRNA genes by Runx2. Nature 445: 442– 446 17251981
  49. Zediak VP, Johnnidis JB, Wherry EJ, Berger SL (2011) Cutting edge: persistently open chromatin at effector gene loci in resting memory CD8+ T cells independent of transcriptional status. J Immunol 186: 2705– 2709 21278341 PMC3474546
  50. Zhao K, Wang W, Rando OJ, Xue Y, Swiderek K, Kuo A, Crabtree GR (1998) Rapid and phosphoinositol‐dependent binding of the SWI/SNF‐like BAF complex to chromatin after T lymphocyte receptor signaling. Cell 95: 625– 636 9845365
  51. Zhao R, Nakamura T, Fu Y, Lazar Z, Spector DL (2011) Gene bookmarking accelerates the kinetics of post‐mitotic transcriptional re‐activation. Nat Cell Biol 13: 1295– 1304 21983563 PMC3210065

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bevington, S. L., Cauchy, P., Piper, J., Bertrand, E., Lalli, N., Jarvis, R. C., Gilding, L. N., Ott, S., Bonifer, C., & Cockerill, P. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Cockerill, Peter N
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2016-01-21
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
515-535
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2314739834
Cited by
110
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • BBSRC
  • Bloodwise
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
Keywords
immunological memory, T cell memory, chromatin remodeling, DNase I hypersensitive sites, naive T cell activation, NFAT, AP-1, ETS1, RUNX1, enhancers, transcriptional reprogramming
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, Deoxyribonuclease I, Humans, Immunologic Memory, Interleukin-3, Mice, Transgenic, RNA, Messenger, Spleen, T-Lymphocytes, Gene Expression, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Transcription Factor AP-1, Jurkat Cells, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit, NFATC Transcription Factors, Proto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1, Chemokine CCL1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review