Cited by 253T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Epigenomics of human CD8 T cell differentiation and aging

Open access
Moskowitz, David M., Zhang, David W., Hu, Bin, Le Saux, Sabine, Yanes, Rolando E., Ye, Zhongde, Buenrostro, Jason D., Weyand, Cornelia M. +2 more·2017·Science Immunology

Abstract

Genome-wide epigenetic profiling defines the transcriptional networks involved in T cell aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciimmunol.aag0192

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Old central memory CD8+ T cells had features of effector T cell differentiation.

    “old central memory CD8+ T cells had features of effector T cell differentiation”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Moskowitz et al., 2017

  • Separate analysis of CD28+ and CD28− CD8+ T cells in young and old individuals was consistent with old CD28+CD8+ T cells being more differentiated, as also suggested by epigenetic studies.

    “A separate analysis of CD28+ and CD28− CD8+ T cells in young and old individuals were consistent with the model that old CD28+CD8+ T cells were more differentiated (Lazuardi et al., 2009) as also suggested by the epigenetic studies of CD8+ T cell subsets (Moskowitz et al., 2017).”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Moskowitz et al., 2017

  • The shift in naive and central memory CD8+ T cells was mediated by increased accessibility at bZIP family sites and closure of Ets family transcription factor binding sites.

    “both mediated by an increase in sites accessible to bZIP family and a closure of Ets family transcription factor binding sites.”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Moskowitz et al., 2017

  • Differentiation-associated chromatin accessibility signatures were mostly preserved during aging, indicating resilience of phenotypically defined T cell subsets.

    “Differentiation-associated chromatin accessibility signatures were mostly preserved during aging, indicating the resilience of phenotypically defined T cell subsets.”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Moskowitz et al., 2017

  • In contrast to mouse virtual memory T cells, the age-related shift to a more differentiated state in human CD8+ T cells was incomplete and not associated with a gain in effector function, but included genes relevant to T cell proliferation.

    “In contrast to virtual memory T cells in the mouse, this shift to a more differentiated state was incomplete and not associated with a gain in effector function, but included genes relevant to T cell proliferation.”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Moskowitz et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskowitz, D. M., Zhang, D. W., Hu, B., Le Saux, S., Yanes, R. E., Ye, Z., Buenrostro, J. D., Weyand, C. M., Greenleaf, W. J., & Goronzy, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Moskowitz, David M.
  • Zhang, David W.
  • Greenleaf, William J.
  • Goronzy, Jörg J.
Venue
Science Immunology
Published
2017-02-24
Volume
2
Issue
8
ISSN
2470-9468 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587865057
Cited by
252
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 8
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (award297003, R01 AI108891, R01 AG015043, U19 AI057266, P50HG007735)
  • Rita Allen Foundation (award297004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
immunosenescence, T cell differentiation, chromatin accessibility, transcription factor binding, naive T cells, central memory T cells, effector memory T cells, BATF, NRF1, ETS1, Eomes, Sp1, oxidative phosphorylation, transcriptional regulatory networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review