Cited by 190Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

AI revolutions in biology: The joys and perils of AlphaFold

Open access
Perrakis, Anastassis, Sixma, Titia K·2021·The EMBO Reports

Abstract

AlphaFold is the most ground-breaking application of AI in science so far; it will revolutionize structural biology, but caution is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embr.202154046

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baek M, DiMaio F, Anishchenko I, Dauparas J, Ovchinnikov S, Lee GR, Wang J, Cong Q, Kinch LN, Schaeffer RD et al (2021) Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three‐track neural network. Science 8754: eabj8754 PMC7612213 34282049
  2. Bouatta N, Sorger P, AlQuraishi M (2021) Protein structure prediction by AlphaFold 2: are attention and symmetries all you need? Acta Crystallogr Sect D Struct Biol 77: 982– 991 34342271 PMC8329862
  3. Burley SK, Berman HM, Bhikadiya C, Bi C, Chen L, Di Costanzo L, Christie C, Duarte JM, Dutta S, Feng Z et al (2019) Protein Data Bank: the single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data. Nucleic Acids Res 47: D520– D528 30357364 PMC6324056
  4. Fernandez‐Leiro R, Bhairosing‐Kok D, Kunetsky V, Laffeber C, Winterwerp HH, Groothuizen F, Fish A, Lebbink JHG, Friedhoff P, Sixma TK et al (2021) The selection process of licensing a DNA mismatch for repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 28: 373– 381 33820992
  5. Kim RQ, van Dijk WJ, Sixma TK (2016) Structure of USP7 catalytic domain and three Ubl‐domains reveals a connector α‐helix with regulatory role. J Struct Biol 195: 11– 18 27183903
  6. Levinthal (1969) Levinthal’s Paradox. In Mossbauer spectroscopy in biological systems: proceedings of a meeting held at allerton house, DeBrunner J T P ME (ed), pp 22– 24. Monticello, IL: University of Illinois
  7. McNicholas S, Potterton E, Wilson KS, Noble MEM (2011) Presenting your structures: the CCP4mg molecular‐graphics software. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 67: 386– 394 21460457 PMC3069754
  8. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K (1995) A large‐scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 23: ii– iv 8710822
  9. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A (2002) Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1‐Mad2 core complex: implications of a “safety belt” binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 21: 2496– 2506 12006501 PMC126000
  10. Stein PE, Leslie AGW, Finch JT, Turnell WG, McLaughlin PJ, Carrell RW (1990) Crystal structure of ovalbumin as a model for the reactive centre of serpins. Nature 347: 99– 102 2395463
  11. Vitre B, Gudimchuk N, Borda R, Kim Y, Heuser JE, Cleveland DW, Grishchuk EL (2014) Kinetochore‐microtubule attachment throughout mitosis potentiated by the elongated stalk of the kinetochore kinesin CENP‐E. Mol Biol Cell 25: 2272– 2281 24920822 PMC4116301

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perrakis, A., & Sixma, T. K.
Affiliations
The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Sixma, Titia K
Venue
The EMBO Reports
Published
2021-10-20
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
e54046-e54046
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W3205208140
Cited by
190
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 3
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (EC), iNEXT-Discovery (871037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
AlphaFold, artificial intelligence in biology, protein structure prediction, structural biology, artificial intelligence in science
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review