CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 199Social Media in Health EducationElectronic Health Records SystemsEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare

Open access
Bamidis, P., Bond, C., Gabarron, E., Househ, M., Lau, A. Y. S., Mayer, M. A., Merolli, M., Hansen, M. +1 more·2015·Yearbook of Medical Informatics
DOI 10.15265/iy-2015-001PMC PMC4587037
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Summary: Objective: Social media, web and mobile technologies are increasingly used in healthcare and directly support patient-centered care. Patients benefit from disease self-management tools, contact to others, and closer monitoring. Researchers study drug efficiency, or recruit patients for clinical studies via these technologies. However, low communication barriers in social-media, limited privacy and security issues lead to problems from an ethical perspective. This paper summarizes the ethical issues to be considered when social media is exploited in healthcare contexts. Methods: Starting from our experiences in social-media research, we collected ethical issues for selected social-media use cases in the context of patient-centered care. Results were enriched by collecting and analyzing relevant literature and were discussed and interpreted by members of the IMIA Social Media Working Group. Results: Most relevant issues in social-media applications are confidence and privacy that need to be carefully preserved. The patient-physician relationship can suffer from the new information gain on both sides since private information of both healthcare provider and consumer may be accessible through the Internet. Physicians need to ensure they keep the borders between private and professional intact. Beyond, preserving patient anonymity when citing Internet content is crucial for research studies. Conclusion: Exploiting medical social-media in healthcare applications requires a careful reflection of roles and responsibilities. Availability of data and information can be useful in many settings, but the abuse of data needs to be prevented. Preserving privacy and confidentiality of online users is a main issue, as well as providing means for patients or Internet users to express concerns on data usage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15265/iy-2015-001

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global consensus can foster responsible and ethical use of AI and robotics in healthcare worldwide.

    “Global consensus can foster responsible and ethical use worldwide.[6,56]”

    From Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Objective and Methods section addresses ethical issues in healthcare social media, not AI or robotics. Section 3.5 mentions a World Medical Association statement urging national guidelines for social-media use, but neither it nor the Conclusions section addresses whether global consensus fosters responsible and ethical use of AI and robotics worldwide. Searches for global consensus and AI or robotics found no passage supporting that point. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Ambiguity prevails in the healthcare sector over moral principles on social media, and healthcare professionals face daily emerging ethical dilemmas.

    “However, ambiguity prevails in the healthcare sector over the moral principles on social media, and modern-day healthcare professionals are finding themselves facing daily emerging ethical dilemmas [10, 11].”

    From Future healthcare providers and professionalism on social media: a cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The undefined borders between private and professional life are compromising the patient-healthcare professional relationship due to private information gains on either side.

    “As one study has pointed out [11], the undefined borders between private life and professional life are compromising the patient-healthcare professional relationship due to private information gains on either side [14].”

    From Future healthcare providers and professionalism on social media: a cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The questionnaire was developed after a thorough literature review, reviewed, and piloted.

    “We developed the questionnaire after a thorough literature review [10–12, 21, 22, 27–31]. We then carefully reviewed the questions and decided on answers that represent more ethical consensus [11, 22, 27, 28]. Lastly, we revised and piloted the final draft of the questionnaire.”

    From Future healthcare providers and professionalism on social media: a cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Patients' privacy is threatened on social media platforms.

    “which is threatened on social media platforms [11].”

    From Future healthcare providers and professionalism on social media: a cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Winter E, editor. Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon. Sprin- ger Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 18th Edition. Gabler Verlag; 2014.
  2. AMA (2014) American Medical Association. AMA Code for Medical Ethics. Opinion 9.124 - Professionalism in the use of social media. URL: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-re- sources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/ opinion9124.page? (Access: 12.08.2014, 13:21).
  3. Fry C. Addressing the ethics of health eResearch with human participants. eResearch Australasia Conference, Melbourne, Australia. 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bamidis, P., Bond, C., Gabarron, E., Househ, M., Lau, A. Y. S., Mayer, M. A., Merolli, M., Hansen, M., & Denecke, K.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of San Francisco (US)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Denecke, K.
ORCID
Venue
Yearbook of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Published
2015-08
Volume
24
Issue
01
Pages
137-147
ISSN
  • 0943-4747 (ISSN-L)
  • 2364-0502
DOI
10.15265/iy-2015-001
PMC
PMC4587037
OpenAlex
W1460903404
Cited by
199
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13
FWCI
20.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Yearbook of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
social media in healthcare, medical ethics, patient privacy, confidentiality, physician-patient relationship, professional boundaries, patient anonymity, data protection, patient-centered care, online health information, research ethics
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Patient-Centered Care, Ethics, Clinical, Ethics, Research, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review