Cited by 37Nursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipNursing Roles and PracticesHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Nursing Informatics Certification Worldwide: History, Pathway, Roles, and Motivation

Open access
Cummins, M. R., Gundlapalli, A. V., Murray, P., Park, H.-A., Lehmann, C. U., Gundlapalli, A. V.·2016·Yearbook of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: Official recognition and certification for informatics professionals are essential aspects of workforce development. Objective: To describe the history, pathways, and nuances of certification in nursing informatics across the globe; compare and contrast those with board certification in clinical informatics for physicians. Methods: (1) A review of the representative literature on informatics certification and related competencies for nurses and physicians, and relevant websites for nursing informatics associations and societies worldwide; (2) similarities and differences between certification processes for nurses and physicians, and (3) perspectives on roles for nursing informatics professionals in healthcare Results: The literature search for ‘nursing informatics certification’ yielded few results in PubMed; Google Scholar yielded a large number of citations that extended to magazines and other non-peer reviewed sources. Worldwide, there are several nursing informatics associations, societies, and workgroups dedicated to nursing informatics associated with medical/health informatics societies. A formal certification program for nursing informatics appears to be available only in the United States. This certification was established in 1992, in concert with the formation and definition of nursing informatics as a specialty practice of nursing by the American Nurses Association. Although informatics is inherently interprofessional, certification pathways for nurses and physicians have developed separately, following long-standing professional structures, training, and pathways aligned with clinical licensure and direct patient care. There is substantial similarity with regard to the skills and competencies required for nurses and physicians to obtain informatics certification in their respective fields. Nurses may apply for and complete a certification examination if they have experience in the field, regardless of formal training. Increasing numbers of informatics nurses are pursuing certification. Conclusions: The pathway to certification is clear and well-established for U.S. based informatics nurses. The motivation for obtaining and maintaining nursing informatics certification appears to be stronger for nurses who do not have an advanced informatics degree. The primary difference between nursing and physician certification pathways relates to the requirement of formal training and level of informatics practice. Nurse informatics certification requires no formal education or training and verifies knowledge and skill at a more basic level. Physician informatics certification validates informatics knowledge and skill at a more advanced level; currently this requires documentation of practice and experience in clinical informatics and in the future will require successful completion of an accredited two-year fellowship in clinical informatics. For the profession of nursing, a graduate degree in nursing or biomedical informatics validates specialty knowledge at a level more comparable to the physician certification. As the field of informatics and its professional organization structures mature, a common certification pathway may be appropriate. Nurses, physicians, and other healthcare professionals with informatics training and certification are needed to contribute their expertise in clinical operations, teaching, research, and executive leadership.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15265/iy-2016-039

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many nursing educational programmes, both entry-level and continuing, do not have enough expertise in teaching health informatics and AI technologies to effectively address the gap in AI understanding.

    “a significant current challenge is that many nursing educational programmes—both in entry‐level nursing education and continuing education of professional nurses—do not have enough expertise in teaching health informatics and AI technologies (Cummins et al., 2016; Mantas & Hasman, 2017) to effectively address this gap in AI understanding.”

    From Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think‐tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative (2021) · cites this paper as Cummins et al., 2016

    The Results describe nursing informatics training and continuing education, and the Discussion says qualified professionals will be needed to teach the next generation (page numbers unavailable). Neither section says that many entry-level or continuing nursing programmes lack teaching expertise in health informatics or AI technologies. Searches for educator shortages, programme deficiencies and AI teaching found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [19]American Medical Informatics Association. Advanced Interprofessional Informatics Certification (AIIC) Program 2014. [Available from: http://www.amia.org/advanced-interprofessional-informatics-certification. [Google Scholar]
  2. [24]Ozbolt JG, Saba VK. A brief history of nursing informatics in the United States of America. Nurs Outlook 2008;56(5):199-205 e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [27]Wolters Kluwer. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. (Lippincott Williams Wilkins); 2016. [Available from: http://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/pages/aboutthejournal.aspx. [Google Scholar]
  4. [44]Poe SS. The Chief Nursing Information Officers Impact on Electronic Health Record Implementation. iHealth Connections 2011;1(1):61-3. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cummins, M. R., Gundlapalli, A. V., Murray, P., Park, H.-A., Lehmann, C. U., & Gundlapalli, A. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Yearbook of Medical Informatics
Published
2016-08
Volume
25
Issue
01
Pages
264-271
ISSN
  • 0943-4747 (ISSN-L)
  • 2364-0502
OpenAlex
W2555814514
Cited by
37
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Yearbook of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
board certification, certification pathways, nursing informatics, professional roles, workforce development, certification examination, informatics competencies
MeSH terms
Certification, Humans, Motivation, Societies, Nursing, Specialty Boards, Nursing Informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review