Cited by 31Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

eHealth usage patterns of European general practitioners: A five-year (2002–2007) comparative study

Ortega Egea, José Manuel, González, María Victoria Román, Menéndez, Manuel Recio·2010·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Purpose This paper provides a five-year (2002-2007) comparative segmentation analysis of how the Internet and dedicated health networks are used by European general practitioners (GPs) and the extent to which external factors affect their use of various eHealth services.Methods Two cross-national sets of survey data collected in 2002 (n=3512) and 2007 (n=3948) have been analyzed. These databases provide information on physicians' eHealth uses in EU-15 countries, including sociodemographic indicators such as country, age, sex, location, and size of the medical practice.Results A total of 3512 and 3948 physicians, respectively, participated in the 2002 and 2007 studies. The percentage of GPs accessing the Internet or a dedicated health network increased from 64.5% in 2002 to 77.1% in 2007. Only these physicians were included in the latent class cluster analyses performed on both datasets, yielding three segments of eHealth users plus a group of non-Internet users. Thus, the following four final segments were identified in the years 2002 and 2007: 'Information Searchers/Average Users', 'Advanced Users/Adv. Users (ePrescribers)', 'Laggards', and 'Non-Internet Users'. Contingency table analyses relating external indicators to physicians' usage patterns of eHealth services confirmed strong country differences, low to moderate age influences reflecting a cohort effect, and moderate effects of practice size, both in 2002 and 2007. Conversely, very weak influences were observed for physicians' sex and location of the medical practice.Conclusion A positive evolution is clearly observable in European primary care physicians' use of eHealth, mainly with regard to online medical information searches, use of electronic health care records, and (to a lesser extent) electronic transfers of patient data. The international comparative profiling of European GPs' eHealth usage patterns contributes to more efficient and continually adapted promotion strategies, aimed at fostering the diffusion of eHealth applications among medical professionals of the analyzed EU-15 countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortega Egea, J. M., González, M. V. R., & Menéndez, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Almería (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
79
Issue
8
Pages
539-553
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982044773
Cited by
31
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
digital health adoption, general practitioners, health networks, electronic prescribing, electronic health records, primary care, cross-national comparison, practice size, cohort effects
MeSH terms
European Union, Geography, Information Services, Physicians, Family, Cluster Analysis, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review